2020
DOI: 10.1177/8755293020935145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near-fault seismic risk assessment of simply supported bridges

Abstract: Bridges tend to sustain excessive seismic demand (e.g. displacement) under pulse-like ground motions attributing to the effect of forward directivity, which is of high likely to occur at locations near the fault rupture. This study tries to incorporate the pulse effect into the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PSDA) framework, which are combined to quantify the risk of earthquake-induced damage in the near-fault location. The near-fault PSDA and PSHA are e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earthquake risk probabilistic evaluation methods have gradually developed into the core of structural and infrastructure system risk mitigation decisions 20‐23 . Plotting the fragility curve of the structure allows intuitively observing this risk probability.…”
Section: Psdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earthquake risk probabilistic evaluation methods have gradually developed into the core of structural and infrastructure system risk mitigation decisions 20‐23 . Plotting the fragility curve of the structure allows intuitively observing this risk probability.…”
Section: Psdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthquake risk probabilistic evaluation methods have gradually developed into the core of structural and infrastructure system risk mitigation decisions. [20][21][22][23] Plotting the fragility curve of the structure allows intuitively observing this risk probability. The fragility curve could be established as a conditional probability table in which the structural requirement exceeds its capability under a given ground motion intensity (IM).…”
Section: Selection Of the Damage Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate IM helps to sufficiently reflect the level of uncertainty in seismic demand and conduct a reliable loss estimation for the structure. An increasing number of studies have focused on the optimal IMs for the probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PSDA) of bridges and IMs such as PGA , 55 PGV 56 as well as spectral acceleration and spectral displacement at fundamental period (Sa,T1, Sd,T1) 57 are commonly‐used ones. However, most of the aforementioned studies refer to straight bridges, and only few 24,58,59 have focused on finding the optimum IMs of curved bridges.…”
Section: Probabilistic Loss Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other group of seismic parameters is defined by response spectra. Table 2 lists the 29 intensity measures implemented in this paper (Housner, 1965; Husid, 1969; Arias, 1970; Sarma and Yang, 1987; Von Thun, 1988; Bommer and Martinez-Pereira, 1999; Zhong et al , 2020). It should be noted in Table 2 that Sa (1.0) , Sv (1.0) and Sd (1.0) adopted in this study represent spectral acceleration, velocity and displacement at the high-order period 1 s of the cable-stayed bridge.…”
Section: Intra-plate Earthquakes and Their Intensity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%