2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near electrical resonance signal enhancement (NERSE) in eddy-current crack detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Zurich Instruments HFLI2 Lock-in Amplifier was used to operate and measure the electrical impedance of the ECT coil at 20 MHz. A Howland current source 1 was used to convert the input voltage into an equivalent current to the sensor coil [30], and mounted immediately behind the sensor coil to eliminate the detrimental high-frequency impedance effects of connecting cables. A low inductance, 25 turn, 1 mm external diameter coil was constructed in-house around a 0.75 mm diameter ferrite rod core 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Zurich Instruments HFLI2 Lock-in Amplifier was used to operate and measure the electrical impedance of the ECT coil at 20 MHz. A Howland current source 1 was used to convert the input voltage into an equivalent current to the sensor coil [30], and mounted immediately behind the sensor coil to eliminate the detrimental high-frequency impedance effects of connecting cables. A low inductance, 25 turn, 1 mm external diameter coil was constructed in-house around a 0.75 mm diameter ferrite rod core 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a non-ferromagnetic test material, this causes an upwards shift in the electrical resonance of the system. When the probe encounters a discontinuity, the effective inductance of the probe is altered and a downwards shift in the electrical resonant frequency occurs, giving rise to the NERSE effect documented in previous papers [4,3,5] and demonstrated in figure 2. The NERSE phenomenon can be exploited via operating at a single frequency within the NERSE band of a probe (on a given material) to improve signal-to-noise (SNR).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Other factors cause changes in capacitance of the system, including, cable length/condition, soldering quality and more. The presence of phantom-resonance signals complicates the exploitation of NERSE phenomenon (see Hughes et al [4]) in array probes. The exploitation of the NERSE effect in an array would likely be much easier with all elements resonating at the same frequency, thereby eliminating the phantom resonance peaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that using probe operating at low frequency is limited to larger defect size and shape [7,8]. Besides making use of advanced signal/image processing techniques to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for small cracks, there are techniques developed to further enhance the limitation in detection capability of conventional eddy current inspections such as pulsed eddy current (PEC) [9][10][11] and near electrical resonance signal enhancement (NERSE) [12,13]. In this technique, the eddy current probe is driven by current source sweeping through multiple frequencies close to its electrical resonance peak, where the response signals can be significantly boosted above the threshold of (electrical) background noise, thus enhance the resolution of the detected defect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%