1976
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.1976.9979662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near eastern alloying and some textual evidence for the early use of arsenical copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…About half of the objects were analysed chemically and showed between 1.5 and 8 wt.% As in the bulk, however, very few underwent microstructural analysis for confirmation. A thorough study of these objects is necessary to determine the cause of surface enrichment, which can include one or more of the following processes: inverse segregation (Meeks, 1993); cementation (Thornton et al, 2009;Smith, 1973;Eaton. and McKerrell, 1976); or (intentionally initiated) corrosion (Northover, 1989, 104;Budd, 1991a;1991b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About half of the objects were analysed chemically and showed between 1.5 and 8 wt.% As in the bulk, however, very few underwent microstructural analysis for confirmation. A thorough study of these objects is necessary to determine the cause of surface enrichment, which can include one or more of the following processes: inverse segregation (Meeks, 1993); cementation (Thornton et al, 2009;Smith, 1973;Eaton. and McKerrell, 1976); or (intentionally initiated) corrosion (Northover, 1989, 104;Budd, 1991a;1991b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…his composition is very clean with traces of Sn, Fe and Ag. his level of As suggests intentional alloying, and although there are discussions as to the limit of As concentration that would signify this intention, a value of 1% is commonly considered the lower limit (Budd, 1992;Charles, 1967;Eaton and McKerrell, 1977;Northover, 1989;Zwicker, 1991). In fact, several of these artifacts are so similar in terms of the chemistries that they could be from the same ore source.…”
Section: Finished Copper Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical and lead isotopic ratios of the analysed samples are listed in Table 1. Although 1 wt% has been proposed as a potentially more meaningful cutoff value for the classification of archaeological copper alloys (Eaton and McKerrell 1976;Northover 1989;Bray et al 2015;Pollard et al 2015), this paper follows the conventional threshold of 2 wt%, which has been widely adopted for Chinese materials to avoid confusion in comparing our results with published data (Wen 1980). According to this criterion, the 24 objects sampled with metal pieces can be divided into two groups, namely unalloyed copper (Cu, 18) and tin bronze (Cu-Sn, 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%