2017 USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (Joint With AP-S Symposium) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/usnc-ursi.2017.8074876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near earth propagation loss model in forest for low power wireless sensor network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 1960s, a significant amount of work has been done to investigate the characterization of the radio channel blocked by vegetation elements [9,10], which proposed different analytical and empirical models to estimate the power attenuation or level excess loss introduced by a signal blockage due to vegetation obstacles, mainly trees [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Among the conventional forest models, we can mention the COST 235 [11] and the Weissberger [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1960s, a significant amount of work has been done to investigate the characterization of the radio channel blocked by vegetation elements [9,10], which proposed different analytical and empirical models to estimate the power attenuation or level excess loss introduced by a signal blockage due to vegetation obstacles, mainly trees [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Among the conventional forest models, we can mention the COST 235 [11] and the Weissberger [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main conclusion to infer is that near-ground models require experimental measurements in order to validate the main propagation mechanisms occurring. Simulation-based solutions present limited scalability and remains restricted to specific environments and certain requirements [ 17 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent models can be found, and even that not comparable to our case, the analysis used may result in interest for future on-going research: study over irregular terrain in 200–600 MHz [ 31 ], forest at 2.4 GHz [ 32 ], snow covered forest at 2.45 GHz [ 33 ], a ray-tracing tool for simulation [ 34 ] or a UWB near-ground wireless network [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some applications of wireless sensor networks, like precision agriculture and prevention of forest fire, are typical examples in which wireless devices are obviously in a vegetation environment either trees, plants, grass, etc. (see [7,[55][56][57]). In this context, for instance, an experimental study has been conducted considering a deployment of a WSN in a forest where the influence of the trunks in the received power by means of a linear regression model has been analyzed [55].…”
Section: Attenuation Due To Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, for instance, an experimental study has been conducted considering a deployment of a WSN in a forest where the influence of the trunks in the received power by means of a linear regression model has been analyzed [55]. Another study in this direction is presented by Tokunou et al [56] for a WSN in a forest environment with antennas height set at 105 cm. According to their measurement results, it seems that a notches pattern can be identified in the relationship between received signal strength and distance, which can be associated with the two-ray model described in Section 6.…”
Section: Attenuation Due To Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%