1997
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199709000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near- and Far-Fields: Source Characteristics and the Conducting Medium in Neurophysiology

Abstract: N e a r -a n d F a r -F ie ld s : S o u r c e C h a r a c te r is tic s a n d th e C o n d u c tin g M e d iu m in N e u r o p h y s io lo g y

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This dipolar moment imbalance generates a net superimposed dipole at the musculotendinous junction that manifests throughout the volume conductor as a so-called far-field potential or standing wave. 10,11,34 Because of the particular recording montage, all of the active electrodes are in the positive region of the superimposed dipole field (Fig. 4E).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dipolar moment imbalance generates a net superimposed dipole at the musculotendinous junction that manifests throughout the volume conductor as a so-called far-field potential or standing wave. 10,11,34 Because of the particular recording montage, all of the active electrodes are in the positive region of the superimposed dipole field (Fig. 4E).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reflects propagating MUAPs along the muscle fibers and the second the nonpropagating end-of-fiber effects arising when the MUAPs meet the muscle-tendon junction (Stegeman et al 1997). Importantly, the currents and potentials associated with these two phenomena differ.…”
Section: Contribution Of End-of-fiber Effects To Monopolar Semgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, eigenvector of mode 1], having peak values at the upper left corner of the EMG grid. Accordingly, the monopolar EMG signals were highly correlated, which occurs because monopolar EMG consists to large extent of so-called far-field activity [18], possibly even from motor units of (distant) other muscles. In terms of force prediction, the first mode showed a substantially higher RMSD compared to the monopolar signal itself [ Fig.…”
Section: B Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at least the modes at both ends of the spectrum appear to have an interpretable structure. Mode 1 may be interpreted as common background or weighted mean of the original monopolar EMG determined by far field potentials [18]. Recall that this mode accounted for about 90% [Fig.…”
Section: B Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%