In 1794, as the Pitt government was cracking down on the popular reform movement, an anonymous Loyalist pamphleteer published a brief history of one of the political clubs and societies that had become radicalized in Britain in the wake of the French Revolution. 1 The focus of the account was the apparent vulgarity, or incivility, of the club, as exemplified by the derogatory toasts and rancorous conversations of its members. But the club had not always been disreputable. According to the pamphleteer, it began as a "convivial society" of great "respectability," and only after the French Revolution did members become "politically mad," wishing to "subvert" the established order. With this shift, the status of the members also changed, as gentlemen left the society and artisans took their place. Intriguingly, such downward mobility was registered in acoustic terms, with intemperate, aggressive, plebeian discussion replacing a model of polite discourse based on equanimity, moderation, and courtesy. 2 The current chairman was a tailor, whose "overbearing" speeches violated basic standards of decorum. Similarly, the leading spokesman was a shoemaker, a follower of Tom Paine with a misguided belief in the power of his own eloquence, as if supposing that the conversations of the workshop provided adequate preparation for engaging in political debate. As the Loyalist pamphleteer opined: