“…When these tests first appear, it was common to predict the concrete strength using only one of the above tests; however, as found by many researchers (Qindan, Paolo, & Stefan, 2011;Samarin & Meynink, 1981;Miretti, Carrasco, Grether, & Passerino, 2004;Hola & Schabowicz, 2005), the combination of a number of NDTs can lead to more accurate and reliable models. In order to approximate the estimations of indicators (response variables), e.g., Ploix et al (Ploix, Garnier, Breysse, & Moysan, 2011) performed a combination or fusion of NDTs data as radar test, electrical resistivity and electrical capacity, infrared thermography, impact echo and ultrasounds to predict the simultaneous estimation of water saturation and porosity rate in concrete, for undamaged concretes measured in laboratory conditions; they measured different NDTs parameters, such as frequencies, velocities, attenuations, etc., that conducted to an statistical analysis with the purpose of identify empirical correlations linking each experimental parameter to both searched indicators; water saturation and porosity rate. There were identified correlations based on bilinear regressions, as a first approach, but since some different NDTs measurements are extremely sensitive to material heterogeneity, variability and experimental noise, relative disagreement or conflict between sources of information (i.e.…”