1984
DOI: 10.1002/apmc.1984.051220110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NCO‐prepolymere aus diisocyanaten mit unterschiedlich reaktiven NCO‐gruppen

Abstract: Es werden zwei Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Verhältnisses der Geschwindigkeitskonstanten γ = k1/k2 bei der Urethanbildung aus Diisocyanaten mit unterschiedlich reaktiven NCO‐Gruppen beschrieben. Bei der Umsetzung mit einem großen Überschuß an n‐Butanol erfolgt sowohl bei 1,6‐Hexamethylendiisocyanat (HDI) als auch bei 3‐Isocyanatomethyl‐3,5,5‐trimethylcyclohexylisocyanat (IPDI) die Umsetzung beider NCO‐Gruppen nach 1. Ordnung. Zur Ermittlung von γ ist nur die experimentelle Bestimmung des NCO‐Umsatzes erforderl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chromatogram thus obtained exhibits two distinct peaks whose retention times and mass spectra match those for peaks 2 and 3 in the chromatogram of the autoclavate. The occurrence of two peaks can be explained by cis‐trans isomerism of the cyclohexane ring, which has already been described in the literature for IPDI derivatives …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chromatogram thus obtained exhibits two distinct peaks whose retention times and mass spectra match those for peaks 2 and 3 in the chromatogram of the autoclavate. The occurrence of two peaks can be explained by cis‐trans isomerism of the cyclohexane ring, which has already been described in the literature for IPDI derivatives …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The only agreement to be found among published reports is that both pairs are present in a ratio of approximately 70:30 with regard to their peak area ratios, and that the NCO group of IPDI, which is bound directly to the cyclohexane ring, is in an equatorial position due to steric hindrance. Earlier publications attribute the more intense signal to the stereoisomer where the CH 2 ‐NCO group is in the axial position and both NCO groups are consequently in a trans position vis‐à‐vis each other (corresponds to ( R,R ) or ( S,S ) in Fig. ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Its generally lower reactivity than the aromatic diisocyanates permits the preparation of water based coatings by deposition from aqueous solution. [15] The used poly(ethylene oxide) is responsible for the high biocompatibility of the coatings, e.g., for medical and laboratory devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Without added catalyst, IPDI reacts mainly with the cycloaliphatic isocyanate group yielding 81-84% secondary urethane (sMU) units. [10] At higher temperatures, the difference in reactivity between cycloaliphatic and primary isocyanate group is reduced. With increasing steric hindrance of the alcohol, the urethane reaction proceeds more selectively towards the formation of primary urethanes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in reactivity of the NCO groups of IPDI has been considered for the synthesis of NCO-terminated prepolymers containing comparatively low monomer contents. Obviously, the position of the NCO groups at a primary and a secondary carbon atom and also steric effects are the reason for their distinctly different reactivities [4]. Jones et al [5] recently reported that under certain conditions the &dquo;secon-dary&dquo; NCO group will react faster than the &dquo;primary&dquo; one.…”
Section: Rigid Surface Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%