Navigation-guided gap arthroplasty in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Yu, Hongbo; Shen, Guofang; Zhang, S.L.; Wang, X.D.; Wang, C.T.; Lin, Yi

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.05.008

Cited by 40 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(27 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Computer guided surgeries with the use of optical navigation systems started their application with the development of neurosurgical surgeries requiring extreme precision [10,11]. Subsequently, due to the evolution of digitalization and progress in the application of computer software in reconstructive procedures and tooling of computer tomography imaging, these surgeries were introduced to various invasive specialties [12][13][14]. Intraoperative computer navigation allows precise transfer of the data from the planned surgery pattern onto the actual operative field.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Case Report: The Clinical Application of a Surgical Navigation System for Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Patient with Maxillary Lateral Incisors Agenesis

Kownacki¹,

Morawiec²

2015

J Clin Case Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Case Report: The Clinical Application of a Surgical Navigation System for Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Patient with Maxillary Lateral Incisors Agenesis

Kownacki¹,

Morawiec²

2015

J Clin Case Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Image-guided navigation in orthognathic surgery enables transfer of individualized 3D virtual planning and drilled screws holes for plating the osteotomy lines [249] to improve the reproducibility of the preoperative simulation [250,251]. Intraoperative navigation has also been used in the resection of the ankylotic bone in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) gap arthroplasty [252] and for TMJ arthroscopy using optoelectronic tracking technology [253,254].…”

Section: Table 4 the Advantages And Disadvantages Of Surgical Guidesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical Engineering in Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review

Olszewski

2012

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review of the literature concerning surgical engineering in cranio-maxillofacial surgery was performed. A PubMed search yielded 1721 papers published between 1999 and 2011. Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1428 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts. A total of 292 articles were finally selected covering the following topics: finite element analysis (n = 18), computer-assisted surgery (n = 111), rapid prototyping models (n = 41), preoperative training simulators (n = 4), surgical guides (n = 23), image-guided navigation (n = 58), augmented reality (n = 2), video tracking (n = 1), distraction osteogenesis (n = 19), robotics (n = 8), and minimal invasive surgery (n = 7). The results show that surgical engineering plays a pivotal role in the development and improvement of cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Some technologies, such as computer-assisted surgery, image-guided navigation, and three-dimensional rapid prototyping models, have reached maturity and allow for multiple clinical applications, while augmented reality, robotics, and endoscopy still need to be improved.

show abstract

“…Surgical navigation is the most commonly used technique, and its indications in craniofacial surgery generally involve trauma, orthognathic surgery, surgical oncology, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and reconstructive surgery …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Surgical navigation is the most commonly used technique, and its indications in craniofacial surgery generally involve trauma, [1][2][3][4] orthognathic surgery, [5][6][7] surgical oncology, [8][9][10] temporomandibular joint (TMJ), 11,12 and reconstructive surgery. [13][14][15] Most of the available literature regarding surgical navigation in the craniofacial field regards a simple description of an application of this technology in a particular clinical setting, such as the use of navigation for foreign body removal, implant positioning, prosthetic placement, orbital reconstruction, or tumor resection, often without an organic description of the actual accuracy of the technique.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A novel approach to skull‐base and orbital osteotomies through virtual planning and navigation

Franz

Isola

Bagatto³

et al. 2018

The Laryngoscope

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Computer‐assisted planning of osteotomy lines, coupled with navigation‐guided performance of planned osteotomies, is a highly innovative approach to skull‐base and orbital surgery. The aim of this pilot study is to provide an assessment of the accuracy of this novel approach in guiding the correct positioning of osteotomy lines in frontal, temporal, and orbital regions, defining the agreement between the spatial position of the planned and performed osteotomies. Methods Fifteen patients with orbital, frontal sinus, and lateral skull‐base diseases underwent virtual surgical planning. Osteotomies to access the orbit, frontal sinus, and lateral skull base were planned on computer tomography‐based three‐dimensional models. The planned osteotomies were reproduced on the operating field using a navigation system. The positions of the performed and planned osteotomies were compared. The results were described as the mean positional difference between planned and performed osteotomies and as Lin's concordance coefficient, and Bland‐Altman limits of agreement were also defined. Results The overall mean difference was 0.719 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.472 to 0.965 mm). Overall, Lin's concordance coefficient was 0.997 (95% CI: 0.996 to 0.998), and overall Bland‐Altman limits of agreement ranged from −1.407 to 2.844 mm. The smallest mean difference (0.587 mm, 95% CI: 0.244 to 0.931 mm) was calculated in the orbit group, whereas the highest mean difference (0.904 mm, 95% CI: 0.428 to 1.379 mm) was described in the lateral skull‐base group. Conclusion This study's results support the use of this novel planning and navigation protocol for guiding osteotomy in anterior and lateral skull‐base surgery, providing a clinical validation of this technique. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 00:1–9, 2018 Laryngoscope, 129:823–831, 2019

show abstract

Navigation-guided gap arthroplasty in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis

Cited by 40 publications

References 23 publications

Case Report: The Clinical Application of a Surgical Navigation System for Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Patient with Maxillary Lateral Incisors Agenesis

Case Report: The Clinical Application of a Surgical Navigation System for Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Patient with Maxillary Lateral Incisors Agenesis

Surgical Engineering in Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review

A novel approach to skull‐base and orbital osteotomies through virtual planning and navigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About