Urban Agroecology 2020
DOI: 10.1201/9780429290992-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, this focus on productivity limits our imagination for the wide variety of cobenefits provided by urban farms and gardens (Siegner et al, 2020). A focus on yield alone arises from reductionist/positivist research paradigms, which form the foundation of many natural (and social) science disciplines (WinklerPrins, 2017;Bowness et al, 2021). Reductionism seeks to break down systems into discrete, ever smaller component parts, and positivism is grounded in the idea that "solving" these component parts will "solve" the systemic problems.…”
Section: Urban Agriculture and Urban Agroecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, this focus on productivity limits our imagination for the wide variety of cobenefits provided by urban farms and gardens (Siegner et al, 2020). A focus on yield alone arises from reductionist/positivist research paradigms, which form the foundation of many natural (and social) science disciplines (WinklerPrins, 2017;Bowness et al, 2021). Reductionism seeks to break down systems into discrete, ever smaller component parts, and positivism is grounded in the idea that "solving" these component parts will "solve" the systemic problems.…”
Section: Urban Agriculture and Urban Agroecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we saw in the results, asymmetrical power relations are just as present in participatory research and manifest in the identity of participants in different roles, differing experiences relating to intersectional identities, funding allocation, and the perceived legitimacy of different types of knowledge. However, while it can sometimes feel, like Nic said, that these asymmetrical power relations "by nature, " they are created, supported, and perpetuated through systems and institutions-such as the "feed the world" narratives that arose out of productivist development paradigms (Bowness et al, 2021). One of our most important areas for work-especially as researchers-is to deconstruct and repair the systems that cause them.…”
Section: Repair Ecologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epistemologies can be described as our ways of knowing (Dring et al, 2022) and habits of mind (Andreotti et al, 2018;Dring et al, 2022); epistemologies are the rules that shape how we know what we know (Galt et al, 2012), what is defined as knowledge, and who holds or generates that knowledge (Wilson, 2009;Galt et al, 2012;Walter and Andersen, 2013). There is a broad body of scholarship interrogating agronomic epistemologies, and here we provide a brief overview based on prior work by agroecology educators (Altieri and Francis, 1992;Parr et al, 2007;Østergaard et al, 2010;Galt et al, 2012;Rosset and Martínez-Torres, 2012;Montenegro de Wit and Iles, 2016;Code, 2017;Andreotti et al, 2018;Francis, 2020;Bowness et al, 2021;Dring et al, 2022;Shanahan, 2022). Agronomic epistemologies typically approach food systems through reductionism, by breaking them down into individual components that are studied through specialized disciplines.…”
Section: Epistemological Conditions and Innovations In Agroecology Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epistemologies enact ontologies-our habits of being (Dring et al, 2022) and understanding of what is real (Jordan et al, 2008;Wilson, 2009), which frame how we relate to each other and the planet (Andreotti et al, 2018). Agronomic ontologies, and Western scientific disciplines more broadly, developed with and as a tool of racial capitalism and colonialism (Andreotti et al, 2018;Bowness et al, 2021). Industrial agriculture-the focus of most agronomic research and education-emerged from racial capitalism and the U.S. plantation system, in which unlimited economic growth from monoculture production systems depended on kidnapping, displacing, torturing, and enslaving Africans and their descendants (Perfecto et al, 2019;Robinson, 2020;Montenegro de Wit, 2021).…”
Section: Ontologies Shape Agroecology Epistemologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%