Navigating the space between landscape science and collective action for sustainability: identifying key factors in information processing

Abstract

Context Transitions to more sustainable landscapes require that actors change their thinking about using the landscape and act collectively to implement a shared view on the future. If landscape ecologists want their knowledge to contribute to such transitions, the information they provide need to stimulate collective decisions and action. Objective To identify key factors that determine how scientific information about landscape functioning and benefits influences actors in organizing collective action for landscape sustainability. Method I combine a theory of knowledge management with a theory of behavioural change to construct a framework of 4 phases of interpretation and implementation of landscape information. Results The 4 phases are: (1) actors accept the information as significant, (2) actors assess the saliency of the information for their case, (3) the information stimulates social network building and collective action, and (4) the information enforces the capacity to organize collaborative change. The extent to which these phases effectively develop in the interaction between scientists and practitioners depends on characteristics of the information, but to a great deal also on the process of interaction and the roles scientist play. I discuss how landscape ecologists can intervene in these phases, by providing the right information and by facilitating an interactive process of knowledge generation. Conclusions Whether landscape information is eventually used in organizing the landscape change depends on characteristics of the information and the governance process in which the information is brought in. Knowledge from social sciences is indispensable for landscape ecology with impact.

Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics

“…While the involvement of academics and experts is important, a participatory approach that directly engages the stakeholders and the public is essential for assessing the cultural and social values of green spaces, empowering citizens, and increasing their sense of community and belonging. Collaborative and participatory approaches are vital to the science and practice of sustainability (Opdam et al 2018 ; Cumming and Epstein 2020 ), and have become particularly prominent in landscape and urban planning during recent decades (e.g., Milovanovic et al 2020 ; Opdam 2020 ).…”

The Social, Political, and Environmental Dimensions in Designing Urban Public Space from a Water Management Perspective: Testing European Experiences

“…This point, together with the pre-eminence of public initiatives, runs in line with the EU Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy initiative, through which consolidating urban climate governance options are required to transform the urban structure as long as it asks for solid cooperation with citizens and local business [61]. Accordingly, while the involvement of experts and specialists is necessary, a participatory approach that directly engages end-users is essential for assessing public spaces' cultural and social values, empowering citizens, and increasing their sense of community and belonging [62]. However, our analysis reveals that projects tend to not specify enough details about how to reinforce and maintain citizens and key stakeholders' involvement before, during, and after the end of the project.…”

Parks, Green Space, and Happiness: A Spatially Specific Sentiment Analysis Using Microblogs in Shanghai, China

“…There is ample evidence that humans make rapid mental responses to landscapes and that these responses include changes in mood states [40]. Change in mood states was likely critical to facilitate our species' ability to make immediate assessments of landscapes that might have posed resources or threats-or a combination of resources and threats [30,41,42].…”