2020
DOI: 10.1080/10345329.2020.1849933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating risk and protective factors for family violence during and after the COVID-19 ‘perfect storm’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the International Day of People with Disability, there was also a request to raise awareness around the plight of people with physical and visual disabilities (wheelchair and visibility cane emojis). Positive emotion was also represented by variations of different-colored heart emojis, as well as the clapping hands emoji, which symbolized both praise of a new $25 million United Nations emergency fund to tackle violence against women during the pandemic, as well as a celebration of the publication of a research paper that investigated risk and protective factors for family violence both during and after the COVID-19 lockdowns) [ 59 ]. While emojis were used across social media platforms (eg, tweets, blogs, forums, and other posts), which is to be expected, no emojis were found to be used within original news media articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the International Day of People with Disability, there was also a request to raise awareness around the plight of people with physical and visual disabilities (wheelchair and visibility cane emojis). Positive emotion was also represented by variations of different-colored heart emojis, as well as the clapping hands emoji, which symbolized both praise of a new $25 million United Nations emergency fund to tackle violence against women during the pandemic, as well as a celebration of the publication of a research paper that investigated risk and protective factors for family violence both during and after the COVID-19 lockdowns) [ 59 ]. While emojis were used across social media platforms (eg, tweets, blogs, forums, and other posts), which is to be expected, no emojis were found to be used within original news media articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first seven questions (1-7) targeted the quantification of the severity of this phenomenon using case vignettes in which answers were evaluated using a four-point scale, using the following potential answers: it is not a case of domestic violence; it is a case of slight domestic violence; it is a case of moderate domestic violence; it is a case of severe domestic violence. The following 10 questions (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) were dichotomous, with yes or no answers and targeted aspects concerning the importance of this phenomenon and the physician's role in the relationship with the patient who is also a DV victim. Finally, the last two questions were multiple-choice and evaluated the media coverage and the potential causes of this phenomenon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leading causes of domestic violence, after Worden, can be based on individual factors (substance abuse, history of violence in the family, adultery/jealousy, psychiatric pathology, dominant personality), family factors (communication problems, relationship problems, stress, coming from an abusive family), macro-factors (low economic status, problems in the workplace or lack of employment) and other factors, such as lack of education, social isolation, not respecting the norms of society [ 17 ]. Protection factors are the relational and social ones, represented by restrictive legislation, social/community support, resources, and services offered by specialized structures [ 18 ] to provide victims with increased self-esteem, social integration, or optimal access to medical care [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite concerns of increasing prevalence during the pandemic and reports of increased calls to the National Domestic Abuse Helpline, 27 women's self-reports decreased during this time, which may represent the lack of opportunity to contact support services for women confined with abusers. 20 Hence, while all service use data are likely to underestimate changes in prevalence, these provide means of understanding changes in the nature of abuse. Concerns have been raised about exposure of children and young people to domestic abuse within their households as a result of spending more time at home, while rising family conflict may also have given rise to increases in C/APV; in June 2020, 14% of frontline domestic abuse services reported an increase in C/APV abuse.…”
Section: What Is Already Known On This Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also offers insights into impacts on exposed third parties, including children, by allowing exploration of whether numbers of children actively making police contact for episodes of domestic abuse increased during the pandemic compared with before and after lockdown periods. The pandemic and associated lockdown may have had significant implications for the nature of abuse, 20 and implications for family members, such as children, if exposed to abuse while spending more time at home and cut off from avenues of support during periods of school closure. Increases in family conflict may have given rise to other forms of domestic abuse, including violence by adolescent children toward their parents ('Child and Adolescent to Parent Violence' or C/APV), which commonly go unreported outside of lockdowns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%