2016
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201610011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating challenges in the application of superresolution microscopy

Abstract: In this review, Lambert and Waters focus on the current practical limitations of superresolution microscopy (SRM) and provide information and resources to help biologists navigate through common pitfalls when designing an SRM experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, ExM SIM imaging with a biological (unexpanded) xy resolution of 100 nm, applied to a fourfoldexpanded sample, would effectively give a biological resolution of 25 nm, and, owing to the limits of optical physics, a biological resolution in the z dimension of 50-60 nm (25). However, a fourfold expansion presents a major challenge in performing conventional superresolution imaging, such as SIM (26). The distance between the expanded sample and the objective lens increases dramatically following expansion, making superresolution imaging nearly impossible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ExM SIM imaging with a biological (unexpanded) xy resolution of 100 nm, applied to a fourfoldexpanded sample, would effectively give a biological resolution of 25 nm, and, owing to the limits of optical physics, a biological resolution in the z dimension of 50-60 nm (25). However, a fourfold expansion presents a major challenge in performing conventional superresolution imaging, such as SIM (26). The distance between the expanded sample and the objective lens increases dramatically following expansion, making superresolution imaging nearly impossible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5C). The slightly larger R g obtained with IF can be explained by the sizes of primary and secondary antibodies that will place the fluorescent label at an offset distance from TRF1-bound telomeres and therefore lead to an apparent size increase (Lambert and Waters 2017).…”
Section: Telomeric Ddr In the Absence Of Decompactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, faster cameras with greater spatial resolution and higher sensitivity and brighter, more stable fluorophores would enable higher-quality images to be collected over longer periods of time than is currently possible. These advances would also help overcome some of the technical problems that currently limit most SR studies to fixed samples, namely, slow image acquisition rates, challenges in labelling proteins in living cells and phototoxicity associated with the high laser illumination intensities 113,114,118 . Thus, SR imaging might eventually be used to look at HR-related reaction mechanisms in living cells as they are occurring in real time.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, although SR studies of the synaptonemal complex have provided beautiful optical images of these structures and new insights into their organization, the impact of this organization on function has yet to be fully revealed 133140 .While the potential of SR imaging is far from being fully realized, we anticipate continued and rapid developments in this powerful technology that will lead to broader applications 114,118 . For instance, traditional approaches have been unable to determine how chromosome organization contributes to homologue bias during meiotic recombination, but this problem may eventually prove amenable to SR imaging.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%