2018
DOI: 10.1017/ipo.2018.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating between ‘friends’ and ‘foes’: the coalition building and networking of Italian interest groups

Abstract: This paper focuses on the reasons that Italian interest groups decide to lobby together with like-minded groups (‘friends’), or engage in networking activity with groups that have conflicting interests (‘foes’), in order to influence public policy. How often do Italian interest groups recur to these lobbying strategies? What favours the construction of a coalition of more or less different interest groups lobbying on a particular issue? What, on the contrary, influences the decision to lobby individually? In o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cekik (2017) by analyzing post-Communist Balkan countries argues that the greater budget of the interest groups, the more likely they participate in political processes. Pritoni (2018) also shows that Italian interest groups who have bigger financial means, the higher access to institutions on the EU level. Klüver (2013) as well observes that organizations with large annual turnover have the ability to get in touch with policy makers, irrespectively of funds earmarked for lobbying activities.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Cekik (2017) by analyzing post-Communist Balkan countries argues that the greater budget of the interest groups, the more likely they participate in political processes. Pritoni (2018) also shows that Italian interest groups who have bigger financial means, the higher access to institutions on the EU level. Klüver (2013) as well observes that organizations with large annual turnover have the ability to get in touch with policy makers, irrespectively of funds earmarked for lobbying activities.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…National public policy actors can take an active stance in EU policymaking by engaging, interpreting, appropriating, or ignoring the processes involved with European integration (Woll & Jacquot, 2010, p. 113). Accordingly, we can note the recent growth in interest in the Europeanisation of interest groups as scholars principally consider the role of interest groups in EU policymaking, their participation in EU-level umbrella organisations, and the effects of EU funding on interest groups (e.g., Dür & Mateo, 2014;Johansson & Jacobsson, 2016;Kanol, 2016;Klüver, 2010;Maloney et al, 2018;Pritoni, 2017;Sanchez Salgado, 2014;Sanchez Salgado & Demidov, 2018).…”
Section: The Europeanisation Of Interest Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%