NaviFields

Murillo, Roberto A. Montano; Gatti, Elia; Segovia, Miguel Oliver; Obrist, Marianna; Massó, José Pascual Molina; Plasencia, Diego Martinez

doi:10.1145/3126594.3126645

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The conventional methods used in many VR games and simulators are based on steering (e.g., first-person shooting game) and teleporting using controllers or joysticks or gaze [91,92] (Figure 8). Additional hardware may be utilized for walking, cycling, driving, and flying in a 3D environment [29,93] (Figure 8), and 3D navigation may not always be easy, usually requiring additional cues [94,95], compared to 2D map-based navigation, which provides a better overview [96].…”

Section: Navigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entering the Next Dimension: A Review of 3D User Interfaces for Virtual Reality

Yeo,

Kwok,

Joshna

et al. 2024

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last decade, the use of virtual reality (VR) technologies has been increasing, as head-mounted display devices, such as the Meta Quest series, have become commercially accessible to everyday consumers. There are plenty of software applications developed for VR, ranging from games to serious training. Despite the fast-growing emergence of novel and natural gesture-based interface components, traditional windows, icons, menus, and pointer user interfaces still remain popular in these implementations. Therefore, navigating and interacting within 3-dimensional environments can still be challenging in virtual reality. This body of work will serve as a reference to the literature survey on 3-dimensional user interfaces and their implementations, and categorize them to reiterate a set of design recommendations for implementing 3-dimensional user interfaces in virtual reality. While questions revolve around the need for a 3-dimensional user interface if a 2-dimensional user interface suffices, we cannot ignore the capabilities and benefits offered when utilising 3-dimensional space. Unlike other work, this work proposes a novel metaphor-guided quadrant model to delineate the 3-dimensional user interface problem in an end-to-end manner. To achieve this, over 30 unique articles selected using a meta-analyses methodology were reviewed. The result highlights the dimensional semantics of the inputs and dimensional outcomes of the virtual targets. Notable reiterated design recommendations would match devices to interaction and then to the tasks in 3-dimensional environments, reducing the degrees of freedom, imposing constraints when possible, and not implementing one single best interaction technique. The results of this survey will be beneficial for virtual reality simulation designers or researchers attempting to determine the appropriate model when developing user interfaces for virtual reality content.

show abstract

Section: Navigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entering the Next Dimension: A Review of 3D User Interfaces for Virtual Reality

Yeo,

Kwok,

Joshna

et al. 2024

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using translational gains, these techniques can even be extended to modulate visual perception involving more complex actions (beyond hand-object interaction in desktopbased experiments), such as walking (Razzaque et al, 2001). Some examples include techniques that modulate the perception of walking speed (Montano-Murillo et al, 2017), walking elevation (Nagao et al, 2017), and distance travelled (Sun et al, 2018).…”

Section: Visual Stimulation Beyond the Screenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multisensory integration research has allowed us to better understand how humans integrate sensory information to produce a unitary experience of the external world. However, this field is often challenged by the limited ability to deliver and control sensory stimuli, especially when going beyond audio–visual events and outside laboratory settings. In this review, we examine the scope and challenges of new technology in the study of multisensory integration in a world that is increasingly characterized as a fusion of physical and digital/virtual events. We discuss multisensory integration research through the lens of novel multisensory technologies and, thus, bring research in human–computer interaction, experimental psychology, and neuroscience closer together. Today, for instance, displays have become volumetric so that visual content is no longer limited to 2D screens, new haptic devices enable tactile stimulation without physical contact, olfactory interfaces provide users with smells precisely synchronized with events in virtual environments, and novel gustatory interfaces enable taste perception through levitating stimuli. These technological advances offer new ways to control and deliver sensory stimulation for multisensory integration research beyond traditional laboratory settings and open up new experimentations in naturally occurring events in everyday life experiences. Our review then summarizes these multisensory technologies and discusses initial insights to introduce a bridge between the disciplines in order to advance the study of multisensory integration.

show abstract

“…Based on our results, the follow up work is to carry out an extensive evaluation in actual HCI applications, particularly in VR. Some examples are: a) how much visual scaling factors affect user's SoA in navigations techniques [49,76]; b) the effect of virtual presence (induced by scenes visualization) on the sense of personal agency [63]; c) to what extent the experience of agency is modified by retargeting techniques [4] without losing significant feeling of control; d) how optimization techniques can improve user's sense of controlling a menu system [5] and e) measure illusion of agency in more complex displays such as gestural interaction and mid-air haptic feedback (e.g., training simulators or videogames). For instance, we may say that video gamers perceive SoA while interacting with a virtual environment even when they are just observing a virtual representation of their body.…”

Section: Future Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond the Libet Clock

Cornelio

Maggioni

Hornbæk

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sense of Agency (SoA) refers to our capability to control our own actions and influence the world around us. Recent research in HCI has been exploring SoA to provide users an instinctive sense of "I did that" as opposed to "the system did that". However, current agency measurements are limited. The Intentional Binding (IB) paradigm provides an implicit measure of the SoA. However, it is constrained by requiring high visual attention to a "Libet clock" onscreen. In this paper, we extend the timing stimulus through auditory and tactile cues. Our results demonstrate that audio timing through voice commands and haptic timing through tactile cues on the hand are alternative techniques to measure the SoA using the IB paradigm. They both address limitations of the traditional method (e.g., lack of engagement and visual demand). We discuss how our results can be applied to measure SoA in tasks involving different interactive scenarios common in HCI.

show abstract

NaviFields

Cited by 11 publications

References 37 publications

Entering the Next Dimension: A Review of 3D User Interfaces for Virtual Reality

Entering the Next Dimension: A Review of 3D User Interfaces for Virtual Reality

Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review

Beyond the Libet Clock

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About