1989
DOI: 10.2514/3.45871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navier-Stokes computations of a prolate spheroid at angle of attack

Abstract: Three-dimensional viscous flow calculations are made for a 6:1 prolate spheroid at conditions for which detailed experimental data are available. The computations are made with two finite-volume algorithms for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, one using central differencing for the convective and pressure terms and the other using an upwind-biased flux-difference-splitting approach. The effects of artificial dissipation on the accuracy of the numerical results are included. Generally good agreement of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A primary pair of streamwise counterrotating vortices are seen to form on the leeward side of the model. Similar flow fields have been observed over a wide range of Reynolds numbers by, for example, Han & Patel (1979) for a 4.3:1 spheroid and Vatsa, Thomas & Wedan (1989), Fu, Shekarriz & Huang (1994), Chesnakas & Simpson (1997), Karlsson & Fureby (2009) and Feymark et al (2012) for a 6:1 prolate spheroid. Werlé (1962), Hornung & Perry (1984) and Bippes (1987) described the separation topologies over similar bodies at low and moderate angles of attack, but here we are concerned with the evolution of the streamwise counter-rotating vortices which comprise the turbulent wake of such bodies in pitch.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…A primary pair of streamwise counterrotating vortices are seen to form on the leeward side of the model. Similar flow fields have been observed over a wide range of Reynolds numbers by, for example, Han & Patel (1979) for a 4.3:1 spheroid and Vatsa, Thomas & Wedan (1989), Fu, Shekarriz & Huang (1994), Chesnakas & Simpson (1997), Karlsson & Fureby (2009) and Feymark et al (2012) for a 6:1 prolate spheroid. Werlé (1962), Hornung & Perry (1984) and Bippes (1987) described the separation topologies over similar bodies at low and moderate angles of attack, but here we are concerned with the evolution of the streamwise counter-rotating vortices which comprise the turbulent wake of such bodies in pitch.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Two axis ratios of the prolate spheroid, namely, 6 : 1 and 4 : 1, were commonly investigated in past studies. For a 6 : 1 prolate spheroid, detailed surface shear stress, pressure, and oil flow pattern measurements have been performed by Kreplin et al [48], which provided a data set for validating the ability of turbulence modeling of Navier-Stokes solvers [49,50]. For a 4 : 1 spheroid, there are more flow visualization studies [46,47] than quantitative measurements.…”
Section: Steady Flow Past a 4 : 1 Prolate Spheroidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies were performed by other authors. 8,26 In the case of airships, the 6:1 prolate spheroid was also employed to approximate the shape of the hull by Omari et al 18,19 To the best of the authors' knowledge, a CFD study of the complete configuration of an LTV or HAV has not been presented in the literature. Hence, after validating the employed CFD methods of Hybrid Air Vehicles Ltd., the present paper provides a study of the aerodynamics for an early variant of the Airlander HAV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%