2000
DOI: 10.1163/156851700509869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naughts and Crosses: Pesher Manuscripts and Their Significance for Reading Practices at Qumran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…78 This is somewhat analogous to the practice in an anonymous commentary on Plato's Theaetetus, which differentiates lemma and commentary by means of a short paragraphos beneath the last line of each section, and marking each line of the lemmata by a diple in the left margin. Snyder 2000, 30-33. 79 Baillet 1982pl.…”
Section: Qpisaiah Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 This is somewhat analogous to the practice in an anonymous commentary on Plato's Theaetetus, which differentiates lemma and commentary by means of a short paragraphos beneath the last line of each section, and marking each line of the lemmata by a diple in the left margin. Snyder 2000, 30-33. 79 Baillet 1982pl.…”
Section: Qpisaiah Cmentioning
confidence: 99%