2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1205.4858
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature of the Spin Liquid Ground State of the S=1/2 Kagome Heisenberg Model

Abstract: We perform a density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) study of the S = 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice to identify the conjectured spin liquid ground state. Exploiting SU(2) spin symmetry, which allows us to keep up to 16 000 DMRG states, we consider cylinders with circumferences up to 17 lattice spacings and find a spin liquid ground state with an estimated per site energy of −0.4386(5), a spin gap of 0.13(1), very short-range decay in spin, dimer and chiral correlation functions and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the theoretical side, they offer a natural framework to investigate and classify the possible phases of quantum matter [68][69][70][71][72] . On the numerical side, they are the basis of novel computational approaches capable of addressing non-perturbatively a large range of interacting systems, including two-dimensional systems of frustrated spins [36][37][38]47,57 and of interacting fermions. [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Tensor network states for one dimensional systems include the matrix product state [1][2][3][4] (MPS), which is the basis of the density matrix renormalization group 5,6 (DMRG) algorithm for computing ground states and the time-evolving block-decimation 18 (TEBD) algorithm for simulating time evolution; the tree tensor network 29 (TTN); and the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz 30,31 (MERA) for critical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the theoretical side, they offer a natural framework to investigate and classify the possible phases of quantum matter [68][69][70][71][72] . On the numerical side, they are the basis of novel computational approaches capable of addressing non-perturbatively a large range of interacting systems, including two-dimensional systems of frustrated spins [36][37][38]47,57 and of interacting fermions. [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Tensor network states for one dimensional systems include the matrix product state [1][2][3][4] (MPS), which is the basis of the density matrix renormalization group 5,6 (DMRG) algorithm for computing ground states and the time-evolving block-decimation 18 (TEBD) algorithm for simulating time evolution; the tree tensor network 29 (TTN); and the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz 30,31 (MERA) for critical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Tensor network states for one dimensional systems include the matrix product state [1][2][3][4] (MPS), which is the basis of the density matrix renormalization group 5,6 (DMRG) algorithm for computing ground states and the time-evolving block-decimation 18 (TEBD) algorithm for simulating time evolution; the tree tensor network 29 (TTN); and the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz 30,31 (MERA) for critical systems. In two (and more) spatial dimensions, one can still use a MPS [36][37][38] or TTN, 39,40 although these tensor networks can only represent small systems since they do not offer an efficient, scalable description. In contrast, a projected entangled pair state 48 (PEPS), which is a higher dimensional generalization of MPS, as well as higher dimensional versions of the MERA, 45 offer a scalable description in two and larger dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical side, new ways of diagnosing the presence and type of topological order from knowledge of the ground state wave-function alone, based on entanglement entropy [11,12], entanglement spectrum [13] and modular transformations [14,15], have been put forward. On the computational side, the advent of tensor networks [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] makes it now possible, by mimicking the structure of entanglement, to efficiently represent a large class of low energy many-body states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an infinite cylinder to a finite torus.-Using an infinite cylinder has the major advantage, compared to previous DMRG studies on a finite cylinder [21][22][23], that it provides a complete set of ground states {|Ψ cyl i } of a local Hamiltonian H. In addition, we can also produce a complete basis {|Ψ tor i } for the (quasi-degenerate) ground space of H on a finite torus of size L x × L y , where the choice L x = L y ensures that also L x ≫ ξ. This is accomplished by reconnecting a region of size L x × L y of the tensor network for {|Ψ cyl i } into a torus, see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, very recently, frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnets on kagome and other lattices are reported to be in the RVB spin liquid phase (Z 2 topological phase) by several authors. [12][13][14] Now that the existence of the RVB spin liquid phase appears to be confirmed in QDMs as well as in antiferromagnets, the issue of superconductivity in doped spin liquids becomes a more pressing question. This isssue started in fact to be investigated shortly after the apearence of QDM 11 Doping of an RVB spin liquid is expected to induce a novel type of elementary excitations called holon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%