1974
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1974)85<1953:notbbo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature of the Boulder Batholith of Montana: Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamilton and Myers (1974) argued that the ca. 70-80 Ma Boulder Batholith was emplaced as a tabular sheet under the Elkhorn Mountain volcanics and thus questioned earlier interpretations by Klepper et al (1971Klepper et al ( , 1974, who interpreted the Boulder Batholith as a steep-sided, thick intrusion. Some emplacement mechanisms involved lateral magma fl ow from the Idaho Batholith along major décollement surfaces beneath Sevier-style thrust plates (Hyndman et al, 1975) or emplacement into a pullapart space formed by intersecting fault sets in the Helena Salient .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hamilton and Myers (1974) argued that the ca. 70-80 Ma Boulder Batholith was emplaced as a tabular sheet under the Elkhorn Mountain volcanics and thus questioned earlier interpretations by Klepper et al (1971Klepper et al ( , 1974, who interpreted the Boulder Batholith as a steep-sided, thick intrusion. Some emplacement mechanisms involved lateral magma fl ow from the Idaho Batholith along major décollement surfaces beneath Sevier-style thrust plates (Hyndman et al, 1975) or emplacement into a pullapart space formed by intersecting fault sets in the Helena Salient .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%