Men Behind Bars 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4292-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature of Prison Exploitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is sexual assault in prisons (Beck et al 2013; Struckman-Johnson and Struckman-Johnson 2006), but evidence suggests that most partnered sexual activity in prison is consensual (Saum et al 1995). As for how common such sex is, one study took a random sample of inmates in a California prison and found that while 78% of the sample identified as heterosexual, 65% claimed to have engaged in consensual sex with another man while in prison (Wooden and Parker 1982). Another study, from a prison in Delaware, found an extremely low percentage of prisoners, 2%, reporting sex with fellow inmates, yet nearly 70% of these respondents reported that consensual sex between men occurred daily in the prison (Saum et al 1995).…”
Section: Theorizing Intersections Of Gender With Race or Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is sexual assault in prisons (Beck et al 2013; Struckman-Johnson and Struckman-Johnson 2006), but evidence suggests that most partnered sexual activity in prison is consensual (Saum et al 1995). As for how common such sex is, one study took a random sample of inmates in a California prison and found that while 78% of the sample identified as heterosexual, 65% claimed to have engaged in consensual sex with another man while in prison (Wooden and Parker 1982). Another study, from a prison in Delaware, found an extremely low percentage of prisoners, 2%, reporting sex with fellow inmates, yet nearly 70% of these respondents reported that consensual sex between men occurred daily in the prison (Saum et al 1995).…”
Section: Theorizing Intersections Of Gender With Race or Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more consistent finding among studies is that correctional staff, including wardens, recognize it as an underreported event (Eigenberg, 1989; Hensley & Tewksbury, 2005a; National Institute of Corrections & the Moss Group, Inc., 2006). Underreporting in the context of a correctional environment may be functional for the victim, as it might prevent further harassment or victimization (Dumond, 2000; Fishman, 1934; Wooden & Parker, 1982). Yet some researchers have also found that officers who were aware of sexual behavior between inmates may ignore it, unless it causes a disturbance (Eigenberg, 2000b; Wooden & Parker, 1982).…”
Section: Research About Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underreporting in the context of a correctional environment may be functional for the victim, as it might prevent further harassment or victimization (Dumond, 2000; Fishman, 1934; Wooden & Parker, 1982). Yet some researchers have also found that officers who were aware of sexual behavior between inmates may ignore it, unless it causes a disturbance (Eigenberg, 2000b; Wooden & Parker, 1982). Scholars who have studied this issue suggest that officers might also have trouble distinguishing what is “consensual” behavior from that which is forced (Eigenberg, 1989, 2000b; National Institute of Corrections & the Moss Group, Inc., 2006).…”
Section: Research About Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classic research on gender, sex, and sexuality in prisons has focused primarily on inmate and staff attitudes toward sex and sexuality (Alarid 2000; Blackburn et al 2011; Coelho and Goncalves 2010; Eigenberg 2000; Hensley and Tewksbury 2005); sexual health, particularly the threat of HIV/AIDS as a result of sexual behavior in prison (Blumberg 1989; Stewart 2007); and sexual coercion, rape, and victimization within the prison environment (Chonco 1989; Knowles 1999; Man and Cronan 2001; Struckman-Johnson et al 1996; Struckman-Johnson and Struckman-Johnson 2006; Wolff, Shi, and Bachman 2008). Studies have also examined consensual sex within male (Hensley 2001; Hensley, Tewksbury, and Wright 2001; Saum et al 1995; Tewksbury 1989; Wooden and Parker 1982) and female (Hensley, Tewksbury, and Koscheski 2002; Otis 1913; Owen 1998; Ward and Kassebaum 1965) prisons, particularly in relation to the prevalence of consensual same-sex behavior. More contemporary research also examines the lives of transgender and gender nonconforming inmates (Jenness 2014; Jenness and Fenstermaker 2014; Sexton, Jenness, and Sumner 2010; Stanley and Smith 2011) and the construction and performance of gender in prison (Evans and Wallace 2008; Karp 2010; Phillips 2001; Ugelvik 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%