2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature-based solutions for flood risk reduction: A probabilistic modeling framework

Abstract: Highlights d Nature-based solutions can significantly reduce the impacts of flooding on society d Current focus on large floods underestimates the benefits of nature-based solutions d Robust probabilistic analysis of nature-based risk reduction in data-scarce contexts d Measuring risk reduction in economic terms can help mainstream nature-based solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pakistan's system of major reservoir and levees is apparently not adequate to eliminate flood damage (though it might have reduced them), particularly because a lot of flooding was caused by extreme precipitation close to the flooded areas [30]. Strengthening existing flood protection, improving local drainage, and increasing infiltration through reforestation and other nature-based solutions [17] might contribute to reduce flood hazards, but it should not be considered in isolation while overlooking opportunities to combine reconstruction and adaptation to decrease exposure to future floods.…”
Section: Discussion and Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pakistan's system of major reservoir and levees is apparently not adequate to eliminate flood damage (though it might have reduced them), particularly because a lot of flooding was caused by extreme precipitation close to the flooded areas [30]. Strengthening existing flood protection, improving local drainage, and increasing infiltration through reforestation and other nature-based solutions [17] might contribute to reduce flood hazards, but it should not be considered in isolation while overlooking opportunities to combine reconstruction and adaptation to decrease exposure to future floods.…”
Section: Discussion and Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, our analysis is based on historical data, and thus captures reactive adaptation to the conditions observed in 2022. Forward looking analyses based on climate [37] and land use projections [17] can point out if floods will increase in magnitude and frequency, to which extents future floods might resemble this past one, and with which probability floods such as the 2022 flood might occur throughout the next decades. Yet, such assessments would be based on a cascade of climate, hydrologic, and hydrodynamic models which would lead to further uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussion and Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NbS evaluation is still challenged in assessing uncertainty and robustness (Lallemant et al, 2021), considering unexpected outcomes (Sala and Torchio, 2019) and multiple outcomes (Chausson et al, 2020). Also, NbS outcome indicators may not necessarily reflect the initial project goals (Dumitru and Wendling, 2021).…”
Section: Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, biodiversity can be improved through The primary challenge for NbS is climate change followed by sustainable city development [6]. To address the challenges of climate change, researchers explored hydro-climatic risks [9], urban heat island mitigation [10], carbon sequestration [11], and flood risk reduction [12]. As for the challenges of sustainable urban development, researchers have focused on shaping blue-green spaces, such as optimising urban parks, forests, and wetlands, to strengthen public health [13], raise incomes [7], and improve the quality of urban ecosystems [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%