2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1608.06266
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally Stable Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter

P. S. Bhupal Dev,
Rabindra N. Mohapatra,
Yongchao Zhang

Abstract: We point out that a class of non-supersymmetric models based on the gauge group SU (3) C × SU (2) L × SU (2) R × U (1) Y L × U (1) Y R possesses an automatic, exact Z 2 symmetry under which the fermions in the SU (2) R × U (1) Y R sector (called R-sector) are odd and those in the SU (2) L × U (1) Y L sector (called L-sector or the Standard Model sector) are even. This symmetry, which is different from the usual parity symmetry of the left-right symmetric models, persists in the lepton sector even after the gau… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a The parity symmetric version could be realized at the TeV scale by doubling the doublet scalars in both the SM and heavy sectors, such that one set of the Yukawa couplings y f,1 is responsible for the SM fermion masses and the other one y f,2 dominates the heavy fermion masses. 11 Once the Σ fields acquire VEVs, the heavy-light quark mass mixing terms δ U = λ U Σ 1 and δ D = λ D Σ 2 appear in the Lagrangian, and the heavy quark can then decay into the SM fermions, leaving only the lightest RHN stable due to the leptonic Z 2 symmetry. The singlets Σ 1,2 are charged under The decay rate of heavy quarks Q → q + Z can be estimated as…”
Section: Depleting the Heavy Quarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a The parity symmetric version could be realized at the TeV scale by doubling the doublet scalars in both the SM and heavy sectors, such that one set of the Yukawa couplings y f,1 is responsible for the SM fermion masses and the other one y f,2 dominates the heavy fermion masses. 11 Once the Σ fields acquire VEVs, the heavy-light quark mass mixing terms δ U = λ U Σ 1 and δ D = λ D Σ 2 appear in the Lagrangian, and the heavy quark can then decay into the SM fermions, leaving only the lightest RHN stable due to the leptonic Z 2 symmetry. The singlets Σ 1,2 are charged under The decay rate of heavy quarks Q → q + Z can be estimated as…”
Section: Depleting the Heavy Quarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those based on the Left-Right (LR) gauge group SU (2) L × SU (2) R × U (1) B−L , [7][8][9] the gauge interactions of RHNs induce further decay modes, which have to be suppressed/forbidden by imposing additional discrete symmetries (or making the model more contrived) to keep the lightest RHN cosmologically stable. 10 In this paper we discuss an alternative class of LR models based on the gauge group SU (3) 11 which has an accidental Z 2 symmetry, at the renormalizable level that keeps the lightest RHN stable making it a natural DM candidate. In this model there exists a right-handed copy of the SM electroweak sector at the TeV scale (or higher), charged under SU (2) R × U (1) Y R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a sequential Z boson with the same couplings as in the SM, the current ATLAS and CMS 13 TeV data requires that M Z > 4.05 TeV at the 95% confidence level [49,50]. The production cross section σ(pp → Z → + − ) in the U (1) B−L model can be obtained by rescaling that of a sequential heavy Z boson, as function of the gauge coupling g BL [51]. To this end, the partial decay widths of the Z boson into the SM fermions, the heavy RHNs and the scalar S are respectively…”
Section: Current Z Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, DM may be much heavier than this bound, if it is not a WIMP. Such models include non-thermal dynamics, decoupled dark sectors, inflationary and gravitational production, nonstandard cosmological histories, and large entropy production [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In none of these cases, however, is the DM abundance solely determined by its interactions with the SM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%