2021
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2021.1938172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally Resilient to Natural Hazards? Urban–Rural Disparities in Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Assistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for such disparities is that low-income households tend to live in hazardous areas because of the lower property values in these places 33 . Another explanation is that lack of government investment in flood protection infrastructure in poorer neighbourhoods has increased flood losses compared with equally hazardous, yet better-protected wealthier neighbourhoods 34,35 . Parsing these underlying drivers is beyond the scope of this analysis but is an important area of future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for such disparities is that low-income households tend to live in hazardous areas because of the lower property values in these places 33 . Another explanation is that lack of government investment in flood protection infrastructure in poorer neighbourhoods has increased flood losses compared with equally hazardous, yet better-protected wealthier neighbourhoods 34,35 . Parsing these underlying drivers is beyond the scope of this analysis but is an important area of future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research also advises that policymakers and practitioners devote resources and capacity building toward addressing inequality in these areas. Given that the allocation of financial resources for hazard reduction often favors particular communities (Seong et al, 2021(Seong et al, , 2022, our findings will support equitable heat mitigation initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Small and/or rural local governments are more limited in terms of personnel, resources, and the institutional capacity available to pursue pre‐flood mitigation strategies post‐disaster recovery funding (Jerolleman, 2020; National Association of Counties, 2019). With low mitigation capacity and high vulnerability to financial risk, flood impacts in rural areas may be absorbed by state or federal entities, and necessitate innovative and tailored solutions for resilience (Cutter et al., 2016; Seong et al., 2021). Financial risk characterizations such as those provided in this analysis can improve understanding of these uncertain community‐level processes, and aid in selecting strategies to prevent excess flood‐related abandonment and community decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%