1975
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-65-737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally Produced Aerosols of Pseudomonas glycinea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly all the airborne bacteria detected were captured about 12 cm above the potted grass exposed to wind-driven rain or sprinkler irrigation, indicating that the bacteria may have been dispersed in ballistic particles generated by impaction of water droplets rather than in aerosols. Splash rather than aerosol dispersal is further indicated by the fact that the bacteria collected on medium in the Andersen sampler were only on the top stage, which is where ballistic particles would most likely be captured in this sampler (Venette & Kennedy, 1975), Previous work in our laboratory (unpublished) indicated that epiphytic populations of P. syringae on trees in nurseries can drop to undetect-able levels and then rise to detectable levels during different times of the year. This observation raised questions concerning the source of inoculum for resurgence of the populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nearly all the airborne bacteria detected were captured about 12 cm above the potted grass exposed to wind-driven rain or sprinkler irrigation, indicating that the bacteria may have been dispersed in ballistic particles generated by impaction of water droplets rather than in aerosols. Splash rather than aerosol dispersal is further indicated by the fact that the bacteria collected on medium in the Andersen sampler were only on the top stage, which is where ballistic particles would most likely be captured in this sampler (Venette & Kennedy, 1975), Previous work in our laboratory (unpublished) indicated that epiphytic populations of P. syringae on trees in nurseries can drop to undetect-able levels and then rise to detectable levels during different times of the year. This observation raised questions concerning the source of inoculum for resurgence of the populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The physical proximity between soil and the various grapevine parts make this hypothesis very likely. In the most common grapevine training systems, the vine trunk and canopy are near the ground, facilitating the migration of micro-organisms from the soil to aerial parts of the plant through rain splash, high winds, insects, etc., [60], [61], [62], [63]. Mechanical soil management, like tillage, a common practice used to control weeds in vineyards, may also contribute to the migration of telluric micro-organisms to the aerial part of the plant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the movement of bacterial plant pathogens over long distances is facilitated by water splash, wind‐driven rain and aerosol (Venette & Kennedy, ; Fitt et al ., ; Butterworth & McCartney, ; Upper & Hirano, ; Mundt et al ., ; Bock et al ., ), vectors such as man, mites and insects (Smith et al ., ; Civerolo, ; Brown, ) and via imported infected fruits (Civerolo, ; Brown, ) and planting materials (Goodman & Hattingh, ; Janse & Wenneker, ; EPPO, ). The latter is one of the most serious problems for effective control of bacterial disease of woody plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%