2022
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9050214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturally Acquired Antibodies to Influenza A Virus in Fall-Migrating North American Mallards

Abstract: Although waterfowl are the primary reservoir for multiple subtypes of influenza A virus (IAV), our understanding of population immunity in naturally infected waterfowl is poorly understood. Population immunity may be an important driver of seasonal subtype predominance in waterfowl populations and may affect the potential for establishment of introduced IAV such as the Eurasian-like A/Goose/Guangdong/1/1996 lineage in these populations. Here, we examine the prevalence of naturally acquired antibodies to nucleo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found no evidence that AIV antibodies mediated the effects of HPAI infection on movement behavior. Antibody prevalence is relatively high during winter 45 , which could have limited our ability to detect subtle changes in behavior of infected mallards; this protective benefit of prior exposure could differ at other times of year or in groups of immunologically naïve birds (e.g., juveniles), which could alter infection-movement relationships. A combination of experimental, observational, and theoretical studies across more species and seasons is necessary to fully understand how immunology and the environment interact to determine the impacts of influenza infection on wild bird behavior and health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found no evidence that AIV antibodies mediated the effects of HPAI infection on movement behavior. Antibody prevalence is relatively high during winter 45 , which could have limited our ability to detect subtle changes in behavior of infected mallards; this protective benefit of prior exposure could differ at other times of year or in groups of immunologically naïve birds (e.g., juveniles), which could alter infection-movement relationships. A combination of experimental, observational, and theoretical studies across more species and seasons is necessary to fully understand how immunology and the environment interact to determine the impacts of influenza infection on wild bird behavior and health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%