2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturalistic viewing conditions can increase task engagement and aesthetic preference but have only minimal impact on EEG quality

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjects also reported that the medium and fast speeds, as well as the advertisement video, were more emotionally moving compared to the slow speed and the landscape video. In contrast to previous findings, no difference in aesthetic pleasure was found for the two videos [48] and the three Tetris speeds.…”
Section: Cross-task Validitycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects also reported that the medium and fast speeds, as well as the advertisement video, were more emotionally moving compared to the slow speed and the landscape video. In contrast to previous findings, no difference in aesthetic pleasure was found for the two videos [48] and the three Tetris speeds.…”
Section: Cross-task Validitycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In our experimental paradigm, we asked participants to fixate on a central cross and refrain from eyeblinks and eye movements during the video presentation since eyeblinks and eye movements contaminate EEG signals. A recent study, however, reported that naturalistic viewing conditions allowing participants’ eyeblinks and eye movements could enhance task engagement in an aesthetic rating task with a minimal impact on the quality of EEG signals 6 . We, therefore, think that a more liberal naturalistic viewing condition can be a better paradigm enhancing the engagement and memory of viewers in our future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Comparing the current results with studies using static stimuli further prompts the question whether neural rhythms are similarly associated with extracting aesthetic appeal for static and dynamic inputs. There are two reasons to expect that rhythmic neural correlates of beauty are more efficiently retrieved with moving stimuli: First, moving stimuli have been reported to be more engaging and to lead to stronger aesthetic experiences [7], which may enhance neural representations of beauty, too. Second, responses to static stimuli are largely driven by evoked visual responses, so that spectral analyses on such data may be driven by frequency components contained in the evoked response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in neuroaesthetics has made great progress by studying responses to static naturalistic images, such as pictures of faces [1][2][3] and scenes [4][5][6]. However, recent investigations suggest that dynamic, compared to static, visual stimuli can evoke stronger feelings of beauty and greater task engagement [7]. So far, only few studies focused on such dynamic aesthetic experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%