2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural vs forced language switching: Free selection and consistent language use eliminate significant performance costs and cognitive demands in the brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, IFG might have increased its volume at an earlier point of their bilingual experience and renormalization might be already in place as the opportunities to use both languages start to increase. This would also go in line with recent evidence showing that forced switching implies increased brain activity in right IFG as measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG), an effect that is absent during natural switching ( Zhu et al, 2022 ). Given the bilingual characteristics of the region where we conducted our study, where a big majority of the population is able to understand both languages, switching is probably more natural than enforced by the context—if the interlocutor understands both languages, changes from one to the other can be performed freely, not because they are required for successful communication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, IFG might have increased its volume at an earlier point of their bilingual experience and renormalization might be already in place as the opportunities to use both languages start to increase. This would also go in line with recent evidence showing that forced switching implies increased brain activity in right IFG as measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG), an effect that is absent during natural switching ( Zhu et al, 2022 ). Given the bilingual characteristics of the region where we conducted our study, where a big majority of the population is able to understand both languages, switching is probably more natural than enforced by the context—if the interlocutor understands both languages, changes from one to the other can be performed freely, not because they are required for successful communication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some comparisons find smaller voluntary than cued costs (e.g., Gollan et al, 2014;Jevtović et al, 2020) while others find comparable costs (e.g, de Bruin et al, 2018;Gollan et al, 2014). However, voluntary costs are not always observed (e.g., Blanco-Elorrieta & Pylkkänen, 2017;Kleinman & Gollan, 2016;Zhu, Blanco-Elorrieta, Sun, Szakay & Sowman, 2022). Although more research is needed, differences in the presence/size of this cost might relate to the bilinguals tested (Green & Abutalebi, 2013), stimuli (e.g., using items strongly associated with one language, Zhu et al, 2022), or instructions (e.g., asking bilinguals to use a bottom-up approach by always choosing the same language for a given picture, Kleinman & Gollan, 2016).…”
Section: Voluntary Language Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it should be noted that switching in such a rapid alternation between two languages required by external cue differs from natural switching in a real-life situation. This is because the former situation allows for an inhibition of the non-target language, whereas natural switching relies on a language-specific selection mechanism that does not trigger inhibitory control (Zhu et al, 2021). Meuter and Allport (1999) also proposed that the relative proficiency levels of bilinguals' two languages should affect the degree of switching cost asymmetry.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%