1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19971027)387:3<325::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural variability in the number of dendritic segments: Model-based inferences about branching during neurite outgrowth

Abstract: A study was made of the possible basis for naturally occurring variations in the number of segments in individual dendritic trees. Distributions of the number of terminal segments have been studied in dendrites from rat, cat, and frog motoneurons, basal dendrites from rat visual cortex pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons, in rat cerebellar Purkinje cell dendritic trees, and in human hippocampal dentate granule cells. By means of a mathematical model for dendritic branching, it was shown that the variation in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(73 reference statements)
4
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For each successive generation, each terminal node of the previous generation is treated in one of the following two ways: (1) with probability P st , growth stops there; (2) with probability P br , the node becomes a branch point, and edges are added with two new terminal nodes (Fig 2F). Terminal growth was previously found to be compatible with the observed topologies in real dendrites [65]. A Galton-Watson process is called critical if P st = 0.5 and P br = 0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For each successive generation, each terminal node of the previous generation is treated in one of the following two ways: (1) with probability P st , growth stops there; (2) with probability P br , the node becomes a branch point, and edges are added with two new terminal nodes (Fig 2F). Terminal growth was previously found to be compatible with the observed topologies in real dendrites [65]. A Galton-Watson process is called critical if P st = 0.5 and P br = 0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Many of the previous models assumed that elongation and branching of dendrites are controlled by probability functions, in which each parameter separately codes individual growth rules such as degree- or segment length- dependent rate of elongation and/or branching [19,20]. In contrast, dendritic patterns are autonomously generated without embedding different parameters to control each branching frequency, branch angle, and self-avoidance of dendrites in our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the stochastic phenomenological model of Van Pelt et al [45][47], each growth cone in the growing tree has a certain probability to branch and elongate. Interestingly, to be able to accurately produce the morphology of a wide range of neuron types, the model needs a competition factor describing how the growth cone's actions depend on the momentary total number of growth cones in the tree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%