2001
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[2203:nsfgrt]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Selection for Grazer Resistance to Toxic Cyanobacteria: Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that toxic cyanobacteria usually result in grazer death, intrinsic rate of population increase would be a better proxy of fitness than juvenile growth rate. In addition to integrating survival and fecundity, intrinsic rate of population increase and population growth rate in this study had longer incubation time than juvenile growth rate in two previous studies (Hairston et al ; Sarnelle and Wilson ). Intrinsic rate of population increases and population growth rate would capture more of the underlying variation in fitness than juvenile growth rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Given that toxic cyanobacteria usually result in grazer death, intrinsic rate of population increase would be a better proxy of fitness than juvenile growth rate. In addition to integrating survival and fecundity, intrinsic rate of population increase and population growth rate in this study had longer incubation time than juvenile growth rate in two previous studies (Hairston et al ; Sarnelle and Wilson ). Intrinsic rate of population increases and population growth rate would capture more of the underlying variation in fitness than juvenile growth rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Net reproductive rate ( R 0 ) was determined by the equation: R 0 = Σ l x m x . A tolerance index ( T ) of each clone to dietary cyanobacteria was calculated as the relative change in intrinsic rate of population increase on poor food ( r poor ) compared with that on good food ( r good ): T = r poor / r good , which is similar to a previous definition (Hairston et al ). A higher value of this index indicates more tolerance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations