Natural Resource Management: Contributions of System Dynamics to Research, Policy and Implementation

Lane, David C.; Kopainsky, Birgit

doi:10.1002/sres.2461

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study relies on systems thinking and system dynamics (Checkland, 1981;Senge, 1990;Lane, 2001a;Cavana et al, 2019;Wolstenholme, 1999Wolstenholme, , 2003Lane & Kopainsky, 2017;Lane, 2000;Lane, Munro, & Husemann, 2016), and the pathways approach (Leach, Scoones, & Stirling, 2010a;Leach, Stirling, & Scoones 2010b;Scoones et al 2007;Cavicchi & Ely, 2016;Lamine, 2011;Byrne et al, 2011) to study the policy feedback process and how the governance structure influence its dynamics. The policy feedback process field explains that the policy designs are influenced by, often dominant actors, and implemented by a combination of these and other marginal actors.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

A “system dynamics perspective” of bioenergy governance and local, sustainable development

Cavicchi

2019

Syst Res Behav Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the governance of bioenergy systems (BESs) and how it influences the bioenergy policy process and local sustainable development. The study compares the BES in Emilia Romagna and Hedmark. At first, bioenergy was expected to mitigate climate change and to tackle the crisis of the primary sectors and related industries. However, bioenergy policies were not equipped to address cross‐sectoral and multilevel issues. Therefore, they failed to secure the local, sustainable development. Critical weaknesses lie in BES governance. Actors' discourses, rules, and power issues form a complex structure that influences the bioenergy policy process and its outcomes. The study relies on systems thinking and system dynamics, and the pathways approach. It uses the system archetypes to investigate the bioenergy policy feedback dynamics and how to leverage local, sustainable development. Results show that power relations and social opposition are critical to a policy change that best secures local, sustainable development.

show abstract

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

A “system dynamics perspective” of bioenergy governance and local, sustainable development

Cavicchi

2019

Syst Res Behav Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each of these eight workshops has resulted in a special issue. For convenience, references to the associated special issues of SR&BS may be found at the end of this Guest Editorial, via the citations Lane, Größler, and Milling (); Lane, Rouwette, and Vennix (); Lane and Schwaninger (); Lane, Bianchi, and Bivona (); Lane, Strohhecker, and Größler (); Lane, Pala, and Barlas (); Lane and Kopainsky ().…”

Section: The Eusdw Workhop Seriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling sustainability pathways: Bridging science, policy, and society

Lane

Videira

2019

Syst Res Behav Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Each of these nine workshops has resulted in a special issue. References to these previous publication are listed at the end of this Guest Editorial, using the citations Lane, Größler, and Milling (2004); Lane, Rouwette, and Vennix (2006); Lane and Schwaninger (2008); Lane, Bianchi, and Bivona (2010); Lane, Strohhecker, and Größler (2012); Lane, Pala, and Barlas (2015); Lane and Kopainsky (2017); Lane and Videira (2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%