2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.306259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural-Resource Exploitation with Costly Enforcement of Property Rights

Abstract: This may explain the more frequent prevalence of free access in lessdeveloped countries. I show that higher resource prices will not lead to more free-access, but may lead to "value destruction".

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now generalize this to allow for the possibility that the state's decision not to govern creates an opportunity for entry by others interested in exploiting the vacated position. 37 It is possible to model most of the various governmental functions (policing, protecting, and penalizing) as functions potentially performed by users rather than the state, but it is problematic to do so (Acheson 2003;Hotte 2001Hotte , 2005. 38 In regard to property rights, these core functions are indicated by the fact that property owners are usually allowed to monitor boundaries and to identify interlopers to police, but not given the These are core functions which the state should not devolve, as the transferability of such functions signals the opening of a very broad and wide-ranging contest regarding state powers.…”
Section: Problems Resulting From Problems Of Governance: Corruption mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now generalize this to allow for the possibility that the state's decision not to govern creates an opportunity for entry by others interested in exploiting the vacated position. 37 It is possible to model most of the various governmental functions (policing, protecting, and penalizing) as functions potentially performed by users rather than the state, but it is problematic to do so (Acheson 2003;Hotte 2001Hotte , 2005. 38 In regard to property rights, these core functions are indicated by the fact that property owners are usually allowed to monitor boundaries and to identify interlopers to police, but not given the These are core functions which the state should not devolve, as the transferability of such functions signals the opening of a very broad and wide-ranging contest regarding state powers.…”
Section: Problems Resulting From Problems Of Governance: Corruption mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simplifying assumption departs from the recent literature that focuses on institutional failures, conflicts, and corruption (Barbier et al, 2005;Hotte, 2005;Amacher et al, 2008) to explain the link between deforestation and slow growth patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This increased enforcement effect may be a dominant factor during early stages of migration, but eventually the direct effect determines ex post migration risks (Hotte, 2005, also argues this in a different model). Due to lower costs, protection effort can be increased while keeping outlays at their previous level.…”
Section: Environment and Development Economics 287mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hotte (2005) and Clarke et al (1993) examine agricultural land users' costly private enforcement effort such as building fences or obtaining formal title. Hotte (2005) and Clarke et al (1993) examine agricultural land users' costly private enforcement effort such as building fences or obtaining formal title.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%