1957
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.81166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural regeneration on a 2-acre mixed oak clear cutting five years after logging /

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kramer and Decker (1944) and Ferrell (1953) were early reporters of the need to increase light in the understory to promote oak; their collective recommendations were to increase light up to one-third of full sunlight. Suggestions to increase light during the last years of rotation were made by Downs and McQuilken (1944), Weitzman and Trimble (1957), Scholz and DeVriend (1957), Tryon andCarvell (1958), andMcGee (1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kramer and Decker (1944) and Ferrell (1953) were early reporters of the need to increase light in the understory to promote oak; their collective recommendations were to increase light up to one-third of full sunlight. Suggestions to increase light during the last years of rotation were made by Downs and McQuilken (1944), Weitzman and Trimble (1957), Scholz and DeVriend (1957), Tryon andCarvell (1958), andMcGee (1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their data showed that large oak was losing out to yellow poplar and sugar maple, with 0−10 stems per acre of oak in the 4-inch dbh and larger size classes, compared with hundreds for yellow poplar and sugar maple. Others were reporting species composition changes away from oak towards red maple and hickory (Keever 1953, Larsen 1953, Nelson 1955, Scholz and DeVriend 1957. Concern rose over how to regenerate oak on these upland sites, and awareness was increasing that clearcutting (also referred to as a "one cut shelterwood" [Tryon and Carvell 1958]) may change stand species composition and did not result in adequate oak regeneration, especially on more productive sites.…”
Section: Desirable Regeneration (Oak) Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%