2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural radioactivity measurements in the city of Ptolemais (Northern Greece)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that the mean mass elemental concentration of uranium for soils analyzed here (2.52 mg kg − 1 ) is comparable to those obtained for the cities of Lagos (Obed et al, 2005) and Manisa (Erees et al, 2006). The mean mass elemental concentration of thorium (9.40 mg kg − 1 ) is consistent with values reported for the cities of Banja Luka (Jankovic et al, 2008), Istanbul (Karahan and Bayulken, 2000), Ptolemais (Psichoudaki and Papaefthymiou, 2008) and Windhoek (Oyedele, 2006). The value of mean elemental concentration of potassium (1.60%) is close to the values reported for the cities of Banja Luka (Jankovic et al, 2008), Ptolemais (Psichoudaki and Papaefthymiou, 2008) and Windhoek (Oyedele, 2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It can be observed that the mean mass elemental concentration of uranium for soils analyzed here (2.52 mg kg − 1 ) is comparable to those obtained for the cities of Lagos (Obed et al, 2005) and Manisa (Erees et al, 2006). The mean mass elemental concentration of thorium (9.40 mg kg − 1 ) is consistent with values reported for the cities of Banja Luka (Jankovic et al, 2008), Istanbul (Karahan and Bayulken, 2000), Ptolemais (Psichoudaki and Papaefthymiou, 2008) and Windhoek (Oyedele, 2006). The value of mean elemental concentration of potassium (1.60%) is close to the values reported for the cities of Banja Luka (Jankovic et al, 2008), Ptolemais (Psichoudaki and Papaefthymiou, 2008) and Windhoek (Oyedele, 2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The activities were determined from measuring their respective decay daughters. The activity concentrations were calculated from the intensity of each line taking into account the mass of the sample, the branching ratios of the γ-decay, the time of counting and the efficiencies of the detector [11] [12].…”
Section: Radioactivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activities were determined from measuring their respective decay daughters. The activity concentrations were calculated from the intensity of each line taking into account the mass of the sample, the branching ratios of the γ-decay, the time of counting and the efficiencies of the detector [18] [19]. The activity concentrations of the investigated samples were calculated from Equation (1):…”
Section: Radioactivity Measurements For Sediment Samples 1) Sample Prmentioning
confidence: 99%