1996
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Radioactivity in Soil and Radiation Levels of Rajasthan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The natural radioactivity of building materials in many countries has been reported [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] . Natural radioactivity in some Indian building materials has also been reported by other authors [6,[11][12][13][14][15] . A knowledge of radioactivity present in construction materials helps to (a) assess the possible radiological hazards to human health and (b) develop the standards and guidelines for use and management of these materials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The natural radioactivity of building materials in many countries has been reported [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] . Natural radioactivity in some Indian building materials has also been reported by other authors [6,[11][12][13][14][15] . A knowledge of radioactivity present in construction materials helps to (a) assess the possible radiological hazards to human health and (b) develop the standards and guidelines for use and management of these materials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Th ( United States 8.9 ± 4.2 3.0 ± 2.5 - Myrick et al (1983) Alps-Apennines, Italy 0.3 -16.7 0.3 -5.6 0.14 -5.14 Chiozzi et al (2002) Amman, Jordan 7.1 4.6 1.7 Ahmad et al (1997) Karak, Jordan 6.7 18.5 1.4 Ahmad et al (1997) Instanbul, Turkey 9.1 1.7 1.1 Karahan and Bayulken (2000) Costal area, Aegean sea, Greece Canary islands 13.3 3.6 2.2 Fernandez et al (1992) Spain 1.7 -50.3 1.1 -13.4 0.2 -5.2 Baeza et al (1992) Rajasthan, India 10.6 -26.1 2.4 -6.3 0.2 -0.5 Nageswara et al (1996) Cyprus <1-9.8 <1 -3.2 <1 -1. Table 2, grouped according to their geological composition illustrated in the legend of Fig.…”
Section: Average Elemental Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values from the current study have been compared to work conducted worldwide in Table VI. The values reported in Orissa, India (Mohanty et al, 2004) Nageswara et al (1996) Istanbul, Turkey 65 (mean) Karahan et al (2000) Taiwan 62 (mean) Yu-Ming et al (1987) Canary islands 67 (mean) Fernandez et al (1992) Greece 69 (mean) Probonas et al (1993) Kerala, India 200-4000 Sunta et al (1981) Ooty, India 31.6-221 Selvasekarapandian et al (1999) Gudalore, India 74.3 ± 27.8 Selvasekarapandian et al (2000) Namibia 90-180 Steinhausler et al (1992) Russaifa, Jordan 97.5 Al-Jundi (2002) Red sea coast, Egypt 26.5-50.9 El-Arabi (2005) Orissa, India 1925 ± 718 (mean) Mohanty et al (2004) World range 28-120 UNSCEAR (1993) Jaduguda, India 100-121 Present study dose rate is due to the high variability in radionuclide concentrations in the samples. It is considered that 98% of the external gamma dose rate from 238 U series is due to 226 Ra and its daughters (Shanbhag et al, 2005).…”
Section: Air Absorbed Gamma Dose Rate (D)mentioning
confidence: 98%