Natural population movement and marriage restrictions and hindrances in Styria in the 17th to 19th centuries

Abstract

To marry has never been an egalitarian option or everybody's wish. There have always been calculations or considerations, structural or individual hindrances and even societal restrictions for individuals to get married despite wishing to do so. Without any doubt and apart from the debate on determination or love and free choice in former times, to marry has always been a societal event, a mutual relationship between personal wishes and societal environmental expectations.And apart from all the debates on paradoxes in modernization processes, it is clear that in pre-modern times societal marriage restrictions were widespread.It is very unlikely that people should have been forbidden to marry because they should not have sexual contacts, just for morality reasons. The keys have been considerations and calculations on reproductivity, economic and social resources, social and human capital. This paper deals with aggregated vital data from four parishes in Styria, Austria, covering the outgoing 17th century until the end of the 19th century, in order to detect hints of marriage restrictions.The paper proves the well-known variety of marriage systems in pre-industrial and pre-modern times. It supports the idea that the presence of marriage restrictions hindered population growth, but the absence of such restrictions did not automatically foster more societal transparency and developmental chances in a modern sense, as mortality and inequality were very strong factors in pre-modern agrarian societies. In the end, the question of marriage restrictions was apparently posed and answered by privileged groups.

Economic origins of cultural norms: The case of animal husbandry and bastardy

“…The literature discusses several other co-factors, such as limited parental authority, neolocality, and the importance of urban labor markets (De Moor and van Zanden, 2010) as potential causes of the EMP. Further, several local and regional case studies reveal substantial variation within this area (e. g. Teibenbacher, 2009). 9 Although illegitimacy is not the same as out-of-wedlock birth in all societies, we use these terms interchangeably.…”

Economic Origins of Cultural Norms: The Case of Animal Husbandry and Bastardy

“…The literature discusses several other co-factors, such as limited parental authority, neolocality, and the importance of urban labor markets (De Moor and van Zanden, 2010) as potential causes of the EMP. Further, several local and regional case studies reveal substantial variation within this area (e. g. Teibenbacher, 2009).…”