1988
DOI: 10.1172/jci113644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural murine autoantibodies and conventional antibodies exhibit similar degrees of antigenic cross-reactivity.

Abstract: Splenic B cells from normal and autoimmune mice were transferred to MHC-compatible xid recipients. Monoclonal antibodies were secreted by the transferred B cells in splenic fragment cultures. These antibodies were evaluated for reactivity and cross-readtivity against a panel of six autoantdgens and two conventional antigens using an ELISA assay. The autoantibodies and conventional antibodits produced in splenic fragment cultures by normal DBA/2 and autoimmune NZB B cells expressed similar degrees of antigenic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the splenic fragment assay to compare the number of cells secreting antibodies reactive with a panel of conventional and autoantigens, we found that antibodies produced by cells from autoimmune strains were no more crossreactive than those from normal straitis (Klinmati et al 1988a). Moreover, those B cells producing crossreactive antibodies were no more reactive with autoantigens than with conventional antigens (Klinman et al 1988a).…”
Section: Are Lupus Autoantibodies Different From Conventional Antibodmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the splenic fragment assay to compare the number of cells secreting antibodies reactive with a panel of conventional and autoantigens, we found that antibodies produced by cells from autoimmune strains were no more crossreactive than those from normal straitis (Klinmati et al 1988a). Moreover, those B cells producing crossreactive antibodies were no more reactive with autoantigens than with conventional antigens (Klinman et al 1988a).…”
Section: Are Lupus Autoantibodies Different From Conventional Antibodmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, established tolerance also can be broken by such stimulants. Moreover, polyclonal immune stimulation is an important feature of the autoantibody production in murine lupus (Moutsopoulos et al 1977, Manny et al 1979, Klinman & Steinberg 1987, Klinman et al 1988a. 1988c.…”
Section: Idiotype-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property of antigenic cross-reactivity has been observed with both conventional antibodies, i.e., those produced after immunization [2], and autoantibodies synthesized by individuals with autoimmune disorders [3]. Such cross-reactivity seems to be particularly frequent among autoantibodies produced during systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease developed by humans [4] and certain strains of mice [5], and characterized by the presence of autoantibodies directed against various components of the cell, namely nucleic acids, histones, ribonucleoproteins (RNP), cytoplasmic proteins, and anionic phospholipids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Furthermore, sufficient evidence has been presented to show that streptococcal infections are capable of inducing crossreactive antibody responses in both humans and laboratory animals (Zabriskie and Freimer 1966;van de Rijn et al 1977;Cunningham et al 1988). However, it is difficult to assign a primary role for the cross-reactive antibodies since evidence that can ascribe pathogenic potential to such antibodies is lacking (Neu et al 1993) and because normal healthy individuals exhibit low levels of self-reactive natural antibodies in their sera without any resultant complications (Klinman et al 1988).…”
Section: Role Of Humoral Immune Response In Pathology Of Post-streptomentioning
confidence: 99%