Proceedings 39th International Conference and Exhibition on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 39
DOI: 10.1109/tools.2001.941679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural-language processing support for developing policy-governed software systems

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prototype tool achieved a 96% accuracy in parsing 99 Naval Postgraduate School security policy statements. [18] This supports our hypothesis that domain-specific natural-language processing tools can potentially attain higher accuracy.…”
Section: A Selective History Of the Relationship Between Re And Nlpsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The prototype tool achieved a 96% accuracy in parsing 99 Naval Postgraduate School security policy statements. [18] This supports our hypothesis that domain-specific natural-language processing tools can potentially attain higher accuracy.…”
Section: A Selective History Of the Relationship Between Re And Nlpsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Much similar work , Kagal 2002, Damianou et al 2001) has been done on defining policies to govern the behaviour of many autonomous processes; however, those policies were written in various languages, including natural language (Michael et al 2001). Use of multiple policy languages without having a common vocabulary leads to ambiguity and unnecessary complexity, and also impacts upon the correctness and accuracy of system behaviour if policies are ill-or incompletely specified.…”
Section: Ontology-based Update Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing natural language to understand policy rules is a difficult task [16]. In order for SPARCLE to be a useful and usable tool, we needed to create a set of grammars that would identify policy elements in each rule with high reliability.…”
Section: Grammar Designmentioning
confidence: 99%