1986
DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630370405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural language processing in information retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many ways of achieving feedback have been tested in IR systems [21] and are being developed in OPACs [2,22,23].…”
Section: Relevance Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many ways of achieving feedback have been tested in IR systems [21] and are being developed in OPACs [2,22,23].…”
Section: Relevance Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the IRS is more user-friendly if the estimated relevance levels of the documents are supplied in a linguistic form (e.g., linguistic terms such as "relevant," "very relevant," may be used) rather than with scores. Following these ideas (Bordogna & Pasi, 1993), several fuzzy linguistic IRSs have been proposed using a fuzzy linguistic approach (Zadeh, 1975) to model the weights in the query and evaluation subsystems (Biswas, Bezdek, Subramanian, & Marques, 1987a, 1987bBolc, Kowalski, & Kozlowska, 1985;Bordogna & Pasi, 1993, 1995aDoszkocs, 1986;Kraft, Bordogna, & Pasi, 1994). In this context, the ordinal fuzzy linguistic approach (Delgado, Verdegay, & Vila, 1993;Herrera & Herrera-Viedma, 1997;Herrera, Herrera-Viedma, & Verdegay, 1996b) is a linguistic approach that allows us to overcome the limitations of the classical fuzzy linguistic approach (Zadeh, 1975), i.e., we do not have to explicitly establish semantic rules or syntactic rules (e.g., using a context-free grammar), thereby reducing, the complexity of the design for the IRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%