Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1386790.1386792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisements

Abstract: In sponsored search, advertisers bid on phrases representative of offered products or services. For large advertisers, these phrases often come from quasi-algorithmically generated lists of thousands of terms prone to poor linguistic construction. A bidded term by itself is usually unsuitable for direct insertion into an ad copy template; it must be rephrased and capitalized properly to fit the template, possibly with additional language to avoid semantic ambiguity. We develop a natural language generation sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to attempt to capitalize the proper nouns in queries, we used a machine-learned system which searches for the query terms and examines how often they are capitalized in the search results, weighting each capitalization occurrence by various features (Bartz et al, 2008). Though the capitalization system provides 79.3% accuracy, using this system we see an only a small increase of accuracy in partof-speech tagging at 70.9%.…”
Section: Automatic Capitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to attempt to capitalize the proper nouns in queries, we used a machine-learned system which searches for the query terms and examines how often they are capitalized in the search results, weighting each capitalization occurrence by various features (Bartz et al, 2008). Though the capitalization system provides 79.3% accuracy, using this system we see an only a small increase of accuracy in partof-speech tagging at 70.9%.…”
Section: Automatic Capitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By gathering all terms, we construct the extracted keywords vector. In order to boost trigrams first, bigrams second and unigrams third, we modify their relevance score with the following factor: boosted_score j = relevance_score j * k noOfGrams (4) where k is a free parameter (in our experiments we set it to (k = 100) and noOfGrams is the number of grams composing a term.…”
Section: Keyword Extraction Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, in the case of traffic maximization as the advertising goal, our two methods which use prediction, surpass the real results. In this experiment, the optimization process had started after the 4th week, because the advertiser until the 3rd week had been testing very few keyword options (3)(4) and the GA needs more testing data to perform a valid optimization. The important observation here compared with the stronger performance of the previous experiment was the use of much older and thus outdated data that did not correspond to valid receiving impressions and clicks in the ith week.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Performance On Optimizing Next Week's Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, "coffeecolored women's t-shirt" is semantically/aesthetically better than "women's coffee-colored t-shirt". Knowing attributecluster labels facilitates obtaining an appropriate attribute order [108], [109]. The attribute-cluster scores help in determining the relevance of an attribute for the product category and hence, whether to include the attribute in the ad copy.…”
Section: Unsupervised Topic Discovery For Attribute Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%