2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24581-0_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Language Agreement Description for Reversible Grammars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the course of text generation, the agreement rules must indicate how the combination of the syntactic categories must be associated with the syntactic elements [7,8,21]. The generation process we propose allows obtaining a surface text based on a structured paths chain.…”
Section: Np -> Noun Noun Adj Np -> Noun Noun Np -> Noun Adjmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of text generation, the agreement rules must indicate how the combination of the syntactic categories must be associated with the syntactic elements [7,8,21]. The generation process we propose allows obtaining a surface text based on a structured paths chain.…”
Section: Np -> Noun Noun Adj Np -> Noun Noun Np -> Noun Adjmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of text generation, the agreement rules must indicate how the combination of the syntactic categories and values must be associated with the syntactic elements [8]. The global task of NLG is to map a given formal input onto a natural language output to achieve a given communicative goal in a specific context ( [1], [6]).…”
Section: Natural Language Generation In Labeled Stratified Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19)(1, 2) <phrase> ::= ( "we" <verbal group>, "we"( r1(<verbal group>( )))) (20)(19,3) <phrase> ::= ( "we" <verb> <complement> <complement'>, "we"( r1( <verb> ( r2( <complement>( )), r3 ( <complement'>( ))))) (21)(20,13) <phrase> ::= ( "we" "provide" <complement> <complement'>, "we"( r1("provide"( r2( <complement>( )), r3( <complement'>( ))))) (22)(21,4) <phrase> ::= ( "we" "provide" <attribute> <noun> <complement'>, "we"( r1("provide"( r2( <noun>(r4( <attribute>( )))), r3(<complement'>( ))))) (23) (22,5) <phrase> ::= ( "we" "provide" <attribute> <noun> "for" <coordination>, "we"( r1("provide"( r2( <noun>(r4( <attribute>( )))), r3("for"( <coordination>( )))))) (24)(23,12) <phrase> ::= ( "we" "provide" "practical <noun> "for" <coordination>, "we"( r1( "provide"( r2( <noun>(r4( "practical"( )))), r3( "for"(<coordination> ( )))))) (25)(24,14) <phrase> ::= ( "we" "provide" "practical" "advice" "for" <coordination>, "we"( r1( "provide"( r2( "advice"(r4( "practical"( )))), r3( "for"( <coordination> ( )))))) (26)(25,6) <phrase> ::= ( "we" "provide" "practical" "advice"…”
Section: Generative Dependency Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) Dependencies: We accept here that the dependency aspects are reduced to the mode different parts of a phrase are in relation one another (coordinate and governor/subordinate relations). c) Agreement: By agreement [5] we will understand the mode different part of speech "match" one another when they are in certain dependency relations from the point of view of the values of different morphologic or syntactic categories.…”
Section: A General Structurementioning
confidence: 99%