2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02936-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural laminar flow wing optimization using a discrete adjoint approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the DMD modes presented here are exclusively located within the high shear stress regions, indicating their inflectional nature. Similarly tilted modes are observed with skewed (oblique) roughness elements in Groskopf & Kloker (2016), with distributed surface roughness in Di Giovanni & Stemmer (2018) and more intensively with cross-flow instability in Malik, Li & Chang (1994); Wassermann & Kloker (2002) and Shi, Mader & Martins (2021). As for case , the mean flow has already been distorted by the interaction of its leading modes, which are identified in figure 18.…”
Section: Controlled Transitionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the DMD modes presented here are exclusively located within the high shear stress regions, indicating their inflectional nature. Similarly tilted modes are observed with skewed (oblique) roughness elements in Groskopf & Kloker (2016), with distributed surface roughness in Di Giovanni & Stemmer (2018) and more intensively with cross-flow instability in Malik, Li & Chang (1994); Wassermann & Kloker (2002) and Shi, Mader & Martins (2021). As for case , the mean flow has already been distorted by the interaction of its leading modes, which are identified in figure 18.…”
Section: Controlled Transitionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is to be noted that the amplitude of the leading mode in Ω u = 1.25 is several orders of magnitude lower than the DMD modes of other cases. Further increase of the rotation speed to Ω u = 1.31 leads to the occurrence of two leading DMD modes (2002) and Shi, Mader & Martins (2021). As for case Ω u = 1.31, the mean flow has already been distorted by the interaction of its leading modes, which are identified in figure 18.…”
Section: Dmd Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where K i is the state feedback gain, derived from (56), and δ i > 0 is the scalar variable. Tis ensures that the m poles of each rule consequence subsystem with PDC controller are precisely situated at λ [48][49][50].…”
Section: Multichannel-h 2 State-feedback Gain Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the laminar techniques, the NLF and HLFC techniques are widely used in maintaining laminar flow [6][7][8][9][10]. The NLF achieves laminar flow on wings via a suitable profile, whereas the HLFC utilizes the suction before the front spar in combination with a suitable shape of the wing box.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sweep angle of the leading edge is 19 °, and the MAC (Mean Aerodynamic Chord) is 3.75 m. After optimization, a considerable laminar region, almost more than 60%, is obtained on the upper surface. Shi et al [8] opti-mized an infinite swept wing with a 25 °sweep angle using an adjoint-based optimization approach. The Mach number is 0.78, and the Reynolds number is 10 × 10 °.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%