2011
DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Antibacterial Innate Immunity: Angels or Devils?

Abstract: Natural killer (NK) cells were first described as immune leukocytes that could kill tumor cells and soon after were reported to kill virus-infected cells. In the mid-1980s, 10 years after their discovery, NK cells were also demonstrated to contribute to the fight against bacterial infection, particularly because of crosstalk with other leukocytes. A wide variety of immune cells are now recognized to interact with NK cells through the production of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-2, IL-12, IL-15 and IL-18, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 214 publications
(136 reference statements)
3
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second relies on the inhibitory recognition of self-proteins that are expressed by normal cells but down-regulated by infected or transformed cells (‘missing self-recognition') [15]. One of the most interesting advances in the biology of NK cells over the past few years came from demonstrating that they can express ‘pathogen recognition receptors', suggesting that a third strategy by which NK cells may undergo the activation and expression of effector functions is the direct recognition of ‘pathogen-associated molecular patterns' (PAMPs) [16,17]. In this context, the pioneer work of Chalifour et al [18] is particularly significant.…”
Section: Biology Of Human Nk Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second relies on the inhibitory recognition of self-proteins that are expressed by normal cells but down-regulated by infected or transformed cells (‘missing self-recognition') [15]. One of the most interesting advances in the biology of NK cells over the past few years came from demonstrating that they can express ‘pathogen recognition receptors', suggesting that a third strategy by which NK cells may undergo the activation and expression of effector functions is the direct recognition of ‘pathogen-associated molecular patterns' (PAMPs) [16,17]. In this context, the pioneer work of Chalifour et al [18] is particularly significant.…”
Section: Biology Of Human Nk Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the ability of NK cells to positively regulate CD8 + and γδ + T cell functions while suppressing Treg expansion may suggest that they are somehow involved in the maintenance of the delicate balance between the effector and regulatory arm of the antigen-specific immune response. Although experimental evidence supports the view that NK cells may contribute to the immune response to MTB at several levels, the possibility that they might also be detrimental as a consequence of excessive activation should not be disregarded [16]. …”
Section: Nk Cell Interaction In Vitro With Other Cells Of the Immune mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is correct, Natural Killer (NK) cells might also be mentioned, as their role in the immune response to bacteria (besides their antiviral and antitumor functions) has been repeatedly documented 2 3. NK cells participate in innate immune defence mechanisms through (i) the release of cytotoxic granules containing, among others, the antibacterial factors granulysin, α-defensins and cathelicidin,2 and (ii) cytokine production that stimulates both innate and adaptive immunity. In addition, they have immunoregulatory properties able to limit excessive immune responses 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in acute infections, probiotic intervention was able to induce total and pathogen-specific IgA [16], and an orally applied probiotic was able to induce a mobilisation of intestinal cells and to provoke changes in the cytokine profile, finally modulating the respiratory mucosal immunity in experimental viral infection [56]. In another study of Villena et al [57], a protective effect of probiotic intervention against the respiratory pathogen Strep. pneumoniae modulated respiratory mucosal immunity after local, intranasal application of the probiotic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%