All Days 1972
DOI: 10.2118/4199-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Hydrocarbon Seepage in the Gulf of Mexico

Abstract: This paper was prepared for the Second Biennial Evangeline Section Regional Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME on Environmental Quality, to be held in Lafayette, La., Nov. 13–14, 1972. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper is presented. Publication elsewhere after publication in the JOURNAL OF presented. Publication elsewhere after publi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is intriguing considering studies for a wide range of marine taxa document phylogeographic breaks between populations in the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic ( Avise 1992 ; Neigel 2009 ). Further perplexing is that the three localities in question are all connected by the strong oceanic Loop Current ( Geyer et al 2020 ) which has the potential to disperse eggs of R. megacantha (the only free-living stage of the life cycle) between these localities, and so maintain genetic homogeneity between all three subpopulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern is intriguing considering studies for a wide range of marine taxa document phylogeographic breaks between populations in the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic ( Avise 1992 ; Neigel 2009 ). Further perplexing is that the three localities in question are all connected by the strong oceanic Loop Current ( Geyer et al 2020 ) which has the potential to disperse eggs of R. megacantha (the only free-living stage of the life cycle) between these localities, and so maintain genetic homogeneity between all three subpopulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the properties of some soft to sticky tar samples is provided in Ref. 3. The density of the samples varies from 0.93 to 1.04 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Selection Of Modeling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But oceanic tar has multiple sources with pollution from oil transportation systems being a prime suspect (Wong et al, 1973;Butler et al, 1973;Jeffrey et al, 1974;Sleeter et al, 1976;Levy & Walton, 1976;Shekel & Ravid, 1977). However, others (Koons & Monaghan, 1973;Geyer & Sweet, 1973;Sweet, 1974;Geyer & Giammona, 1980;Geyer, 1981) argue that, at least for the Gulf of Mexico, the oceanic tar is mostly from natural oil seeps, although the exact locations of most of these seeps are difficult to identify. Ocean tars provide evidence for seeps but they are difficult to use in estimating natural seepage rates.…”
Section: Million ° ~I Metric Tonnes/yearmentioning
confidence: 99%