1992
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.23.1.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Hybridization as an Evolutionary Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
343
1
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(356 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
343
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the risk of outbreeding depression, conservationists commonly agree to prevent mating between distantly related individuals from geographically distinct conspecific populations or subspecies (Arnold 1992;Roques et al 2001). In contrast to this, our data (this study) and that of Pitra et al (2002) suggest that intraspecific outbreeding actually happens in nature when individuals from distinct populations/lineages meet.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In order to reduce the risk of outbreeding depression, conservationists commonly agree to prevent mating between distantly related individuals from geographically distinct conspecific populations or subspecies (Arnold 1992;Roques et al 2001). In contrast to this, our data (this study) and that of Pitra et al (2002) suggest that intraspecific outbreeding actually happens in nature when individuals from distinct populations/lineages meet.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Given that it has been over 20 years since hybrids were first described in these populations, it is just as likely that these individuals are the result of selfing or backcrossing. In many systems with documented high degrees of hybridization, the majority of individuals were backcrossed or selfed hybrids rather than original F 1 hybrids (Arnold 1992(Arnold , 1997Cruzan and Arnold 1994;Nason et al 1992;Rieseberg 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these plants can self, which seems likely as both parental species can and do, then it is possible that a proportion of those individuals with an F 1 hybrid RFLP-PCR pattern are also second generation of hybrid origin. Previous studies have found that even in systems in which there is a high level of hybridization, the majority of individuals present in the population have arisen due to backcrossing or selfing rather than from F 1 hybrids crosses (Arnold 1992(Arnold , 1997Cruzan and Arnold 1994;Nason et al 1992;Reiseberg 1995). The presence of backcrossed and/or selfed individuals increases the likelihood of genetic assimilation, making the identification of hybrids even more difficult in future generations (Rhymer and Simberloff 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%