2000
DOI: 10.1159/000020093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural History of Residual Renal Stone Fragments after ESWL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the term 'clinically insignificant' has been applied to stone fragments of ≤ 4 mm, studies [16][17][18][19][20] have shown that 12-46% of such fragments can increase in size (over median follow-up periods of 23-40 months). Candau et al .…”
Section: The Fate Of 'Clinically Insignificant Fragments' After Swlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the term 'clinically insignificant' has been applied to stone fragments of ≤ 4 mm, studies [16][17][18][19][20] have shown that 12-46% of such fragments can increase in size (over median follow-up periods of 23-40 months). Candau et al .…”
Section: The Fate Of 'Clinically Insignificant Fragments' After Swlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Candau et al . [16] observed 97 non-infected, isolated fragments for a median of 40 months and described a stone-free status of only 33%, although 30% of the calculi remained stable.…”
Section: The Fate Of 'Clinically Insignificant Fragments' After Swlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the UHCT was almost 100% compared to 47.6% for KUB, 89.2% for linear tomography and 67.8% for US (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). UHCT, despite its high sensitivity and specificity in stone detection, is not perfect.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Residual Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Candau et al (8) suggested that the term clinically insignificant residual fragments should not be used to define residual stone fragments after ESWL due to the significantly increased rate of complementary treatments. Khaitan et al (4) Natural history of residual fragments after PCNL In a study by Ganpule et al, (9) 2469 patients who underwent PCNL were evaluated and residual fragments were identified in 7.57% of the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preoperative factors analyzed were stone diameter (mm), stone volume (mm 3 ), stone number, stone side (right or left), age, sex, height, bodyweight, BMI, presence of hydronephrosis (including partial hydronephrosis), presence of lower pole calculi, preoperative placement of ureteral stent and stone location (ureter stones, renal stones, or both). Stone volume was determined on 5 mm axial and 3.5 mm reconstructed coronal NCCT images, as described previously.…”
Section: Pre-and Postoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%