2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03410-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity after long-term follow-up of more than 2 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
107
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the majority of pure GGNs remained stable on later follow-up. On the other hand, in study populations, which included patients with a history of malignancy, a much higher proportion (15%-58%) of pure GGNs showed interval growth (42,43). These studies indicate that a history of past malignancy is a risk factor for nodule growth.…”
Section: Natural Clinical Course Of Subsolid Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, the majority of pure GGNs remained stable on later follow-up. On the other hand, in study populations, which included patients with a history of malignancy, a much higher proportion (15%-58%) of pure GGNs showed interval growth (42,43). These studies indicate that a history of past malignancy is a risk factor for nodule growth.…”
Section: Natural Clinical Course Of Subsolid Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A single pure GGN larger than 5 mm requires an initial follow-up CT at 3 months followed by yearly CT scans for a minimum of 3 years as long as the lesion is persistent and stable in size A pure GGN that is larger than 5 mm is likely to be a preinvasive AAH or AIS and is amenable to a conservative approach with CT surveillance [12] . The initial 3-month follow-up CT is done to identify the pure GGNs that spontaneously disappear, as well as the rapidly growing nodules.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This speculation matches the clinical observation that about half of pure groundglass opacities, identified on high-resolution computed tomography and usually diagnosed as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia or nonmucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma on histopathological examination, do not increase in size and density for more than 2 years. 23 However, we did not observed significant differences in histology, tumor maximum size, and proliferation activity (estimated by Ki-67 LI) between atypical adenomatous hyperplasias with and without EGFR mutations ( Figure 1; Table 3). Further studies are needed to determine the biological differences between atypical adenomatous hyperplasias with and without EGFR mutations.…”
Section: Egfr Mutation In Pulmonary Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia mentioning
confidence: 64%