A42. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes 2010
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2010.181.1_meetingabstracts.a1531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural History Of Asymptomatic Smokers With Normal Spirometry And Reduced Diffusion Capacity: Do They Develop COPD?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hyperpolarized gas diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has also been used to identify emphysema, with a correlation of elevated levels of the apparent diffusion coefficient with decreased DL CO (91). We have observed that smokers with normal spirometry and low DL CO are at higher risk for the development of COPD as defined by the GOLD criteria than are smokers with normal spirometry and normal DL CO (92), but there was no direct correlation of emphysema with EMP levels or DL CO . This was not surprising, as healthy smokers with normal spirometry and normal DL CO without any clinical evidence of emphysema showed increased EMP levels as well, indicating that the complexity of the correlation between EMP and smoking-induced early vascular lung endothelium damage may not exclusively rely on the presence of emphysema as detailed by conventional clinical parameters such as DL CO and/or chest HRCT.…”
Section: Early Detection Of Lung Destructionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hyperpolarized gas diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has also been used to identify emphysema, with a correlation of elevated levels of the apparent diffusion coefficient with decreased DL CO (91). We have observed that smokers with normal spirometry and low DL CO are at higher risk for the development of COPD as defined by the GOLD criteria than are smokers with normal spirometry and normal DL CO (92), but there was no direct correlation of emphysema with EMP levels or DL CO . This was not surprising, as healthy smokers with normal spirometry and normal DL CO without any clinical evidence of emphysema showed increased EMP levels as well, indicating that the complexity of the correlation between EMP and smoking-induced early vascular lung endothelium damage may not exclusively rely on the presence of emphysema as detailed by conventional clinical parameters such as DL CO and/or chest HRCT.…”
Section: Early Detection Of Lung Destructionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, DLCO seems to have a role in the evaluation of at-risk subjects, in early stages of lung disease or when they have not yet developed it 7. Thus, some evidence suggests that a reduced DLCO predicts a future decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ),8 9 and it has been reported that, in smokers with normal spirometry, a low DLCO increases the risk of developing COPD 10. Even a DLCO below 85% predicted has been found to be a significant predictor of all-cause mortality 11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%