Celebrities can generate substantial attention, and influence public interest in species. Using a large‐scale examination of publicly available data, we assessed whether species across six taxonomic groups receive more attention on Wikipedia jj(according to their page views) when named after celebrities than when not. We conducted our analysis for four increasingly strict thresholds of how many average daily Wikipedia page views define a celebrity (1, 10, 100, and 1000). Overall, we found a high probability (0.96–0.98) that species named after celebrities had more page views than their closest relatives that are not named after celebrities, irrespective of the celebrity threshold. The multiplicative effect on species’ page views was larger but more uncertain with increasing celebrity page‐view thresholds, and ranged from 1.08 (1.00–1.18 95% credible interval [CI]) for a celebrity threshold of 1 view to 1.76 (0.96–2.80 95% CI) for a celebrity threshold of 1000. The hierarchical estimates for the various taxa tended to be positive; the strongest effects were for invertebrates, followed by amphibians, reptiles, fish, and mammals, whilst the weakest effect was for birds at lower page‐view thresholds defining a celebrity. Our results suggest that naming species after celebrities could be particularly significant for those belonging to taxonomic groups that are generally less popular than others (e.g., invertebrates). Overall, these findings provide a novel contribution to the conservation marketing literature. We discuss how celebrities, and their attributes, may influence the effectiveness of this marketing strategy. We also consider the potential social implications of using eponyms. Finally, we encourage taxonomists to examine whether naming threatened species after celebrities could affect conservation support, especially for species that are otherwise typically overlooked by the public.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved