1980
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-198003000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Family Planning. II. Basal Body Temperature and Estimated Time of Ovulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current analysis compares well with the results of previous studies that correlated the PD with the estimated day of ovulation [1][2][3]. The current study results, however, show the PD to be a little more variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the current analysis compares well with the results of previous studies that correlated the PD with the estimated day of ovulation [1][2][3]. The current study results, however, show the PD to be a little more variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A final descriptive comparison is that the fertile period of the current study of 9.5 days (SD = 4.0) was comparable to the 9.6 days in the WHO study and the 9.3 days in the Hilgers and associates study [3,15]. The mean number of peak mucus days in front of the ETO in the current study and the Hilgers study was 4.2 days [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations