2021
DOI: 10.18494/sam.2021.3664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Ecological Background of Terrestrial Vegetation in China: Identification Methods and Spatial Differentiation Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these methods also have some limitations [31]. To compensate for the lack of spatial dimension information, some researchers compared the differences in ecological changes inside and outside the nature reserve from the ecosystem scale to evaluate the effectiveness of the nature reserve [26,[32][33][34][35][36][37], or by extending a certain buffer zone in the nature reserve to compare and analyze the differences inside and outside the nature reserve [15]. This paper comprehensively analyzes the changes in the ecosystem type, vegetation ecological quality and ecosystem services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, these methods also have some limitations [31]. To compensate for the lack of spatial dimension information, some researchers compared the differences in ecological changes inside and outside the nature reserve from the ecosystem scale to evaluate the effectiveness of the nature reserve [26,[32][33][34][35][36][37], or by extending a certain buffer zone in the nature reserve to compare and analyze the differences inside and outside the nature reserve [15]. This paper comprehensively analyzes the changes in the ecosystem type, vegetation ecological quality and ecosystem services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, multiple sub-regions with control policies of different degrees of strictness are constructed in a geographical region. The new system can generate different impacts on ecosystem protection and restoration, which has attracted the attention of relevant scholars [36,[38][39][40]. Therefore, it is of positive significance for improving regional ecological protection policies and enriching the evaluation methods regarding ecological protection effectiveness to explore the changes in ecosystems and the differences in protection effectiveness at different management and control levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the study showed forests and grasslands with different vegetation functions had high spatial heterogeneity in the four vegetation parameters of gross primary productivity (GPP), net primary productivity (NPP), LAI, and vegetation cover (FVC). This was manifested by different rates of vegetation recovery, vegetation productivity, and ecosystem stability [43]. Mainly influenced by climatic drivers, the differences in urban forest functions are also reflected in many aspects such as green density, green intensity, and biodiversity [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%